Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34231819›Full record

ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2021

Safety issues of raw milk: evaluation of bacteriological and physicochemical characteristics of human milk from a bank in a teaching hospital, focusing on Staphylococcus species.

Tatiana Salerno, Amanda Keller Siqueira, José Paes de Almeida Nogueira Pinto, Maria de Lourdes Ribeiro de Souza da Cunha, Patrícia Kelly Silvestre, Larissa Anuska Zeni Condas, Gustavo Henrique Batista Lara, Juliano Gonçalves Pereira, Aristeu Vieira da Silva, Fernando José Paganini Listoni and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Occurrence ofToxins · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tatiana SalernoUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal e Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5975-3793
Amanda Keller SiqueiraUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal e Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1419-8332
José Paes de Almeida Nogueira PintoUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal e Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7965-3180
Maria de Lourdes Ribeiro de Souza da CunhaUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Microbiologia, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9079-2723
Patrícia Kelly SilvestreUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Larissa Anuska Zeni CondasUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal e Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5064-9412
Gustavo Henrique Batista LaraUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal e Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Juliano Gonçalves PereiraUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal e Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8713-7506
Aristeu Vieira da SilvaUniversidade de Feira de Santana, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3842-2279
Fernando José Paganini ListoniUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal e Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0696-0769
Lorrayne de Souza Araújo MartinsUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal e Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1485-8959
Rodrigo Garcia MottaUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal e Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0180-0387
Márcio Garcia RibeiroUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal e Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2682-9389
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Estadual de Feira de Santana · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many infants are nurtured with milk supplied by human banks, whose bacteriological and physical-chemical profiles are a major issue. We investigated the bacteriological and physical-chemical characteristics, as well as genotypic and phenotypic and profiles of Staphylococcus species isolated from 240 samples of breast milk from a bank in a teaching hospital. Dornic acidity of milk revealed that 95.4% (229/240) had acceptable limits (< 8.0 oD). Caloric intake showed a wide variation in cream content (4%), fat (4%) and energy values (559.81 Kcal/L). Staphylococcus (105/186 or 56.5%) and Enterobacter (25/186 or 13.4%) were the most prevalent genera, although other microorganisms were identified, including Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (125/157 or 79.6%), vancomycin (115/157 or 73.2%), and cephalexin (112/157 or 71.3%) were the most effective antimicrobials. High resistance rates of isolates were found to penicillin G (141/157 or 89.8%), ampicillin (135/157 or 86%), and oxacillin (118/157 or 75.2%). Multidrug resistance to ≥ 3 antimicrobials occurred in 66.2% (123/186) of the isolates. Residues of microbial multiplication inhibitory substances were found in 85% (204/240) of samples. Among the coagulase-positive-CPS and negative-CoNS staphylococci, the mecA gene was detected in 53.3% (8/15) and 75% (30/40), respectively. Genes sea, seb and sec were detected in 20% (3/15) of CPS, while tsst-1 was detected in 13.34% (2/15). In addition, 13.3% (2/15) of S. aureus were toxin-producers. Genes sea, seb and sec were detected in 90% (36/40), 5% (2/40) and 15% (6/40) CoNS, respectively. Enterotoxin production was identified in 5% (2/40) of CoNS. The identification of multidrug-resistant bacteria, staphylococci species toxin-producers harboring methicillin-resistance genes, and residues of microbial multiplication inhibitory substances reinforce the need for a continuous vigilance of milk quality offered to infant consumption by human banks.

Indexed as

Milk, HumanStaphylococcal InfectionsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoagulaseFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMilkStaphylococcusStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoagulase

Identifiers

PMID34231819
PMCPMC8266376
OpenAlexW3179182649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.