ArticleEuropean journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2021
Comparison of transient elastography and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium alone to predict mortality and liver transplantation.
Article in European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Brief Model Evaluated Outcomes After Liver Transplantation Based on the Matching of Donor Graft and Recipient.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2025Article
- The Evolution of the MELD Score and Its Implications in Liver Transplant Allocation: A Beginner's Guide for Trainees.ACG case reports journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesModel for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) alone and with sodium (MELD-Na) have decreasing predictive capacity as trends in liver disease evolve. We sought to combine transient elastography (TE) with MELD-Na to improve its predictive ability.
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study comparing the use of TE, MELD-Na, and composite MELD-Na-TE to predict liver transplantation and all-cause mortality, with hepatic decompensation as a secondary outcome. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to measure predictive ability and control for confounders.
resultsOf the 214 patients, the mean age was 53 years with 35% being female and 76% being Caucasian. Hepatitis C (59%) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (22%) were the most frequent liver disease etiologies. On univariable analysis, MELD-Na [hazard ratio (HR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.2, P < 0.001], TE (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.06, P < 0.001) and composite MELD-Na-TE (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.08-1.19, P < 0.001) were associated with death or transplant. On multivariable analysis, MELD-Na was no longer significant (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.95-1.22, P = 0.27) after adjusting for TE (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07, P < 0.001) while composite MELD-Na-TE remained significant (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.09-1.24, P < 0.001). Composite MELD-Na-TE predicts mortality or liver transplant with the highest C-statistic of 0.81. Age (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1-1.09, P = 0.04), TE (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.06, P < 0.001) and composite MELD-Na-TE (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.15, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with hepatic decompensation.
conclusionComposite MELD-Na-TE better predicts liver transplantation, death, and hepatic decompensation compared to MELD/MELD-Na or TE alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.