Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34231320›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2022

Sociodemographic inequities in nurturing care for early childhood development across Brazilian municipalities.

Gabriela Buccini, Stefanie Eugênia Dos Anjos Coelho Kubo, Jéssica Pedroso, Juracy Bertoldo, Alberto Sironi, Marcos Ennes Barreto, Rafael Pérez-Escamilla, Sonia Isoyama Venancio, Muriel Bauermann Gubert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Blueprint for Enhancing Implementation Quality ofGlobal implementation research and applications · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gabriela BucciniDepartment of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6008-0987
Stefanie Eugênia Dos Anjos Coelho KuboDepartamento de Nutrição, Universidade de Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.
Jéssica PedrosoDepartamento de Nutrição, Universidade de Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5446-4319
Juracy BertoldoDepartment of Computing, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Alberto SironiDepartment of Computing, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Marcos Ennes BarretoDepartment of Computing, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Rafael Pérez-EscamillaDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9416-8039
Sonia Isoyama VenancioNúcleo de Evidências, Instituto de Saúde da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Muriel Bauermann GubertDepartamento de Nutrição, Universidade de Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing an enabling nurturing care environment for early childhood development (ECD) that cuts across the five domains of the Nurturing Care Framework (i.e., good health, adequate nutrition, opportunities for early learning, security and safety and responsive caregiving) has become a global priority. Brazil is home to approximately 18.5 million children under 5 years of age, of which 13% are at risk of poor development due to socio-economic inequalities. We explored whether the Early Childhood Friendly Municipal Index (IMAPI) can detect inequities in nurturing care ECD environments across the 5570 Brazilian municipalities. We examined the validity of the IMAPI scores and conducted descriptive analyses for assessing sociodemographic inequities by nurturing care domains and between and within regions. The strong correlations between school achievement (positive) and socially vulnerable children (negative) confirmed the IMAPI as a multidimensional nurturing care indicator. Low IMAPI scores were more frequent in the North (72.7%) and Northeast (63.3%) regions and in small (47.7%) and medium (43.3%) size municipalities. Conversely, high IMAPI scores were more frequent in the more prosperous South (52.9%) and Southeast (41.2%) regions and in metropolitan areas (41.2%). The security and safety domain had the lowest mean differences (MDs) among Brazilian regions (MD = 5) and population size (MD = 3). Between-region analyses confirmed inequities between the North/Northeast and South/Southeast. The biggest within-region inequity gaps were found in the Northeast (from -22 to 15) and the North (-21 to 19). The IMAPI distinguished the nurturing care ECD environments across Brazilian municipalities and can inform equitable and intersectoral multilevel decision making.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentBrazilChildChild, PreschoolCitiesHumansBrazilchild developmentcitiesenvironmental indicatorindexmonitoringnurturing carepublic health surveillance

Identifiers

PMID34231320
PMCPMC8968940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.