Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34231164›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2022

Influence of incorrect staging of colorectal carcinoma on oncological outcome: are we playing safely?

Claudia Reali, Gabriele Bocca, Ian Lindsey, Oliver Jones, Chris Cunningham, Richard Guy, Bruce George, Stephen Boyce

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia RealiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Colchester General Hospital, Turner Road, 33 Groves Close, Colchester, CO4 5JL, UK. claudiareali88@live.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8101-8170
Gabriele BoccaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
Ian LindseyDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
Oliver JonesDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
Chris CunninghamDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
Richard GuyDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
Bruce GeorgeDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
Stephen BoyceDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBColchester Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate preoperative staging of colorectal cancers is critical in selecting patients for neoadjuvant therapy prior to resection. Inaccurate staging, particularly understaging, may lead to involved resection margins and poor oncological outcomes. Our aim is to determine preoperative imaging accuracy of colorectal cancers compared to histopathology and define the effect of inaccurate staging on patient selection for neoadjuvant treatment(NT). Staging and treatment were determined for patients undergoing colorectal resections for adenocarcinomas in a single tertiary centre(2016-2020). Data were obtained for 948 patients. The staging was correct for both T and N stage in 19.68% of colon cancer patients. T stage was under-staged in 18.58%. At resection, 23 patients (3.36%) had involved pathological margins; only 7 of which had been predicted by pre-operative staging. However, the staging was correct for both T and N stage in 53.85% of rectal cancer patients. T stage was understaged in 26.89%. Thirteen patients had involved(R1)margins; T4 had been accurately predicted in all of these cases. There was a general trend in understaging both the tumor and lymphonodal involvement (T p < 0.00001 N p < 0.00001) causing a failure in administrating NT in 0.1% of patients with colon tumor, but not with rectal cancer. Preoperative radiological staging tended to understage both colonic and rectal cancers. In colonic tumours this may lead to a misled opportunity to treat with neoadjuvant therapy, resulting in involved margins at resection.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaColonic NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsHumansMargins of ExcisionNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingAdenocarcinomaColorectal CancersOutcomesPositive MarginsStadiation

Identifiers

PMID34231164
PMCPMC8995263
OpenAlexW3178682913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.