ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Controlling environmental pollution: dynamic role of fiscal decentralization in CO
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of geopolitical risk on environmental sustainability and the moderating role of environmental policy stringency.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effects of macroprudential policies on ecological footprint: the moderating role of environmental policy stringency in the top 11 largest countries.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Revisiting the nexus between fiscal decentralization and COFinancial innovation · 2023Article
- Exploring the Role of Environmental Regulation and Fiscal Decentralization in Regional Energy Efficiency in the Context of Global Climate.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Does Human Capital Matter for China's Green Growth?-Examination Based on Econometric Model and Machine Learning Methods.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Modeling for Insights: Does Fiscal Decentralization Impede Ecological Footprint?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Linking Green Human Resource Practices and Environmental Economics Performance: The Role of Green Economic Organizational Culture and Green Psychological Climate.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The "environment" has become one of the important and debatable topics of the world and policymakers identifying the new predictors of CO2 emissions. Therefore, some economies have been promoting fiscal decentralization to encourage environmental quality by granting more financial autonomy to provincial and sub-national governments. Therefore, this study evaluates the dynamic effect of fiscal decentralization on CO2 in selected nine Asian economies using a fresh dynamic panel ARDL model from 1984 to 2017. The empirical findings show that fiscal decentralization has asymmetric effects on CO2 emissions because a positive change in revenue and expenditure decentralization reduced CO2 emissions in Asia. Moreover, a negative change in expenditure decentralization has also enhanced CO2 emissions in the long run. Thus, clean environmental policies and recommendations can be revised and proposed based on nonlinear findings in the modern era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34231148What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.