Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34231124›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2021

Irinotecan-based chemotherapy in extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas: survival and safety data from a multicentric Italian experience.

Camilla Bardasi, Andrea Spallanzani, Stefania Benatti, Francesca Spada, Alice Laffi, Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Daniele Lavacchi, Riccardo Marconcini, Marco Ferrari, Margherita Rimini and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Radioligand Therapy with [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla BardasiDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Andrea SpallanzaniDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Stefania BenattiDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Francesca SpadaDivision of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Alice LaffiDivision of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo AntonuzzoClinical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Daniele LavacchiClinical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Riccardo MarconciniUnit of Medical Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Marco FerrariUnit of Medical Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Margherita RiminiDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Francesco CaputoDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Chiara SantiniDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Krisida CermaDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Andrea Casadei-GardiniDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Vita-Salute, San Raffaele Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Kalliopi AndrikouDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Massimiliano SalatiDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Federica BertoliniDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Annalisa FontanaDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Massimo DominiciDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Gabriele LuppiDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Fabio GelsominoDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy. fabiogelsomino83@yahoo.it.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Florence · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are a rare subgroup of neuroendocrine neoplasms that occasionally originate from gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tract. Evidence of the effectiveness of chemotherapy is scarce. Platinum plus Etoposide regimens are currently the standard treatment in first-line, while little data are available on second-line treatments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan (IRI)-based chemotherapy in a series of extrapulmonary NECs.

methodsPatients with NEC diagnosis treated at University Hospitals of Modena, Florence, Pisa, and European Institute of Oncology of Milan with an IRI-based regimen (FOLFIRI or XELIRI) after progression to a first-line platinum-based therapy were enrolled. Objective responses were assessed according to RECIST criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated.

resultsThirty-four patients, 16 males, and 18 females, median age of 59 years (range 32-77), with metastatic NEC were included. Twenty-seven patients had Ki-67 ≥ 55% and four patients Ki-67 of <55% (for three patients data were not available). The median number of treatment cycles of the IRI-based regimen was 7.5 (range 1-16). Six partial responses (17.6%) and 9 stable diseases (26.5%) were observed, with a disease control rate of 44.1%. Median PFS and OS were 4.4 and 5.9 months, respectively. Neutropenia, anemia, and nausea were the only G3-G4 toxicities reported.

conclusionsDespite the relatively small sample size, IRI-based therapy demonstrated to be a valid option for patients with pretreated extrapulmonary NEC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, NeuroendocrineNeuroendocrine TumorsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansIrinotecanItalyMaleMiddle AgedIrinotecanChemotherapyIrinotecanNECNeuroendocrine carcinomaSecond-line treatmentSurvival

Identifiers

PMID34231124
OpenAlexW3160844413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.