SynthesisAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions2022
Comparative Efficacy of Five SGLT2i on Cardiorenal Events: A Network Meta-analysis Based on Ten CVOTs.
Synthesis in American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Improving heart failure outcomes with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in different patient groups.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2023Review
- Review
- Article
- Review
- SGLT2 Inhibitors: The Dawn of a New Era in Cardio-Metabolic Therapeutics.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2022Article
- Dapagliflozin: A Review in Symptomatic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe relative efficacy of different sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on cardiorenal outcomes is unclear.
methodsWe included cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) of SGLT2i. The eight endpoints of interest were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cardiovascular death (CVD), CVD or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), HHF, kidney function progression (KFP), and all-cause death (ACD). We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis and calculated the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability to rank treatments.
resultsWe included ten CVOTs involving five SGLT2i. Canagliflozin (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.77), dapagliflozin (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.62-0.79), empagliflozin (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.59-0.78), ertugliflozin (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.54-0.90), and sotagliflozin (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.56-0.77) versus placebo reduced HHF, whereas none reduced MI and stroke. Empagliflozin reduced CVD or HHF (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.67-0.99) and KFP (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.45-0.93), and dapagliflozin reduced KFP (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.52-0.92), versus ertugliflozin. Canagliflozin had the greatest SUCRA values for the reduction of MACE, stroke, and HHF, whereas empagliflozin had the greatest SUCRA values for the reduction of MI, CVD, CVD or HHF, KFP, and ACD.
conclusionsCanagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, ertugliflozin, and sotagliflozin versus placebo reduce HHF but none reduces MI and stroke. Canagliflozin is most effective in reducing MACE and HHF, and empagliflozin is most effective in reducing CVD, CVD or HHF, KFP, and ACD. These findings will guide the use of specific SGLT2i in the prevention of different cardiorenal events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.