Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34231118›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2021

Australian propolis ethanol extract exerts antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by mechanisms of disrupting cell structure, reversing resistance, and resisting biofilm.

Fei Wang, Hui Liu, Junya Li, Wenwen Zhang, Bin Jiang, Hongzhuan Xuan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antimicrobial activity of brown propolis ethanolic extract and its application in intramammary formulation for the treatment of bovine mastitis.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antibacterial activity of Chinese propolis and its synergy with β-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Antibacterial Activity of Chinese Red Propolis againstMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fei Wang *School of Life Science, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252059, China.
Hui Liu *School of Life Science, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252059, China.
Junya LiSchool of Life Science, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252059, China.
Wenwen ZhangInstitute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.
Bin JiangCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118, China. jiangbin1117@126.com.
Hongzhuan XuanSchool of Life Science, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252059, China. jiangbin1117@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7823-1488
Liaocheng University · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNJilin Agricultural University · CN

Funding

the Doctoral Research Foundation of Liaocheng University No. 318051826the Modern Agricultural Technology System of Shandong Province SDAIT-24-05the National Natural Science Foundation of China NO. 31672499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antibacterial activity and mechanisms of Australian propolis ethanol extract (APEE) against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were investigated herein. The diameter of inhibition zones (DIZ) of APEE was 19.7 mm, while the minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericide concentration (MBC) of APEE were both 0.9 mg/mL against the tested strain of MRSA. Nucleic acid leakage and propidium iodide (PI) staining assays showed that APEE can stimulate the release of intracellular nucleic acids by disrupting the integrity of the cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) further confirmed that APEE could depress cellular activities via damaging the cell structure, including the cell wall and membrane. Western blot analysis and β-lactamase activity assay showed that APEE could inhibit the expression of PBP2a and reduce the activity of β-lactamase, suggesting that APEE is able to reverse the drug resistance of MRSA. XTT and crystal violet (CV) assays indicated that APEE had the capacity to prevent the formation of biofilms through decreasing cellular activities and biomass. Bacterial adhesion assay revealed that APEE could reduce the adhesive capacity of the strain, belonging to its antibiofilm mechanisms. Furthermore, nine main compounds of APEE were identified and quantified by HPLC-DAD/Q-TOF-MS. The results above all verified that the antibacterial activity of APEE against MRSA was mainly due to disrupting cell structure, reversing resistance, and resisting biofilm formation, which indicates that APEE is expected to be an efficient functional ingredient with great potential application in the field of medicine and food.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPropolisAnti-Bacterial AgentsAustraliaBiofilmsEthanolMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPlant ExtractsAnti-Bacterial AgentsEthanolPlant ExtractsPropolisAustralian propolisBiofilmCell structureDrug resistanceMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID34231118
PMCPMC8578493
OpenAlexW3181955661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.