Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34231110›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021

Artificial intelligence-the future is now.

Mark P Trolice, Carol Curchoe, Alexander M Quaas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. SART CORS IVF registry: looking to the past to shape future perspectives.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. In Contemporary Reproductive Medicine Human Beings are Not Yet Dispensable.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The DIY IVF cycle-harnessing the power of deeptech to bring ART to the masses.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Will Artificial Intelligence Change the Future of IVF?Journal of reproduction & infertility
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark P TroliceObstetrics and Gynecology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA. DrTrolice@TheIVFcenter.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2619-2042
Carol CurchoeCCRM Orange County, Beach, Newport, CA, USA.
Alexander M QuaasDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pros and cons of artificial intelligence in assisted reproductive technology are presented.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceReproductive Techniques, AssistedComputational BiologyDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedEmbryologyHumansInfertilityPrecision MedicineARTArtificial intelligenceAssisted reproductive technologyEmbryologyInfertilityIn vitro fertilizationIVFReproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID34231110
PMCPMC8260235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.