Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34231024›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2022

Letter to the Editor: The Efficacy of Cell-Assisted Lipotransfer Versus Conventional Lipotransfer in Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jerry Lorren Dominic, Amudhan Kannan, Asma Ahmed, Raul A Marquez, Armand Asarian, George Keckeisen

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jerry Lorren DominicStony Brook Medicine/Southampton hospital, Southampton, NY, United States.
Amudhan KannanJawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, 605006, India. amudhankannan.2499@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7289-7035
Asma AhmedUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States.
Raul A MarquezCornerstone Regional Hospital, South Texas Health System, Edinburg, TX, United States.
Armand AsarianThe Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY, United States.
George KeckeisenStony Brook Medicine/Southampton hospital, Southampton, NY, United States.
Southampton Hospital · USBrooklyn Hospital Center · USJawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · INParkland Health & Hospital System · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a letter to the editor about a meta-analysis titled "The efficacy of cell-assisted lipotransfer versus conventional lipotransfer in breast augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis" by Li and Chen published in the year 2021. The most frequently performed aesthetic procedure is breast augmentation surgery. In breast augmentation, cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL) has received high recognition due to its positive outcomes. There are controversies in the medical literature on the use of CAL for breast augmentation. This meta-analysis by Li and Chen has concluded that CAL using ASC was superior to other methods as it improved fat survival rate in breast augmentation. We have written this letter to the editor of the Aesthetic Plastic Surgery journal about this meta-analysis because of its impactful information provided by this study to the medical literature for breast augmentation surgery using cell-assisted lipotransfer. Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Indexed as

MammaplastyEstheticsHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID34231024
OpenAlexW3180584643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.