Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34230892›Full record

ReviewRegenerative engineering and translational medicine2022

3D Printing: Advancement in Biogenerative Engineering to Combat Shortage of Organs and Bioapplicable Materials.

Arpana Parihar, Vasundhara Pandita, Avinash Kumar, Dipesh Singh Parihar, Nidhi Puranik, Tapas Bajpai, Raju Khan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regenerative engineering and translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Three-dimensional-printed shape-memory composite scaffold for meniscus repair.The Journal of international medical research · 2026
    Article
  4. Beyond graphene: the MXene era in bioprinting.Biomedical engineering online · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. New Frontiers in 3D Printing Using Biocompatible Polymers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Extrusion bioprinting: meeting the promise of human tissue biofabrication?Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Heterogeneous and Composite Bioinks for 3D-Bioprinting of Complex Tissue.Biomedical materials & devices (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Bioprinting of Cardiac Tissue in Space: Where Are We?Advanced healthcare materials · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Arpana PariharDepartment of Biochemistry and Genetics, Barkatullah University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462026 India.ORCID 0000-0003-3678-9405
Vasundhara PanditaDepartment of Biochemistry and Genetics, Barkatullah University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462026 India.
Avinash KumarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Design & Manufacturing (IIITD&M), Kancheepuram, 600127 India.
Dipesh Singh PariharEngineering College Tuwa , At. & Post. Tuwa, Taluka Godhra, Dist. Panchmahal, Godhra, Gujarat 388713 India.
Nidhi PuranikDepartment of Biochemistry and Genetics, Barkatullah University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462026 India.
Tapas BajpaiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur, 302017 India.
Raju KhanMicrofluidics & MEMS Centre, CSIR-Advanced Materials and Processes Research Institute (AMPRI), Hoshangabad Road Bhopal, 462026 India.
Advanced Materials and Processes Research Institute · INBarkatullah University · INIndian Institute of Information Technology, Design and Manufacturing, Kancheepuram · INMalaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur · INVoluntary Health Association of Goa · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: Organ or cell transplantation is medically evaluated for end-stage failure saving or extending the lives of thousands of patients who are suffering from organ failure disorders. The unavailability of adequate organs for transplantation to meet the existing demand is a major challenge in the medical field. This led to day-day-increase in the number of patients on transplant waiting lists as well as in the number of patients dying while on the queue. Recently, technological advancements in the field of biogenerative engineering have the potential to regenerate tissues and, in some cases, create new tissues and organs. In this context, major advances and innovations are being made in the fields of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine which have a huge impact on the scientific community is three-dimensional bioprinting (3D bioprinting) of tissues and organs. Besides this, the decellularization of organs and using this as a scaffold for generating new organs through the recellularization process shows promising results. This review discussed about current approaches for tissue and organ engineering including methods of scaffold designing, recent advances in 3D bioprinting, organs regenerated successfully using 3D printing, and extended application of 3D bioprinting technique in the field of medicine. Besides this, information about commercially available 3D printers has also been included in this article. Lay Summary: Today's need for organs for the transplantation process in order to save a patient's life or to enhance the survival rate of diseased one is the prime concern among the scientific community. Recent, advances in the field of biogenerative engineering have the potential to regenerate tissues and create organs compatible with the patient's body. In this context, major advances and innovations are being made in the fields of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine which have a huge impact on the scientific community is three-dimensional bioprinting (3D bioprinting) of tissues and organs. Besides this, the decellularization of organs and using this as a scaffold for generating new organs through the recellularization process shows promising results. This review dealt with the current approaches for tissue and organ engineering including methods of scaffold designing, recent advances in 3D bioprinting, organs regenerated successfully using 3D printing, and extended application of 3D bioprinting technique in the field of medicine. Furthermore, information about commercially available 3D printers has also been included in this article.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingDecellularizationDrug efficacy testingOrgan donorOrgan transplantationScaffold designing

Identifiers

PMID34230892
PMCPMC8252697
OpenAlexW3178761135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.