Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34230794›Full record

ArticleJournal of community & applied social psychology

Prosociality and hoarding amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A tale of four countries.

Dwight C K Tse, Vienne W Lau, Ying-Yi Hong, Michelle C Bligh, Maria Kakarika

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community & applied social psychology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How German and Italian Laypeople Reason about Distributive Shortages during COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Not "My" crisis: Social identity and followers' crisis responses to COVID-19.Analyses of social issues and public policy : ASAP · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dwight C K TseSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2725-1849
Vienne W LauDepartment of Management University of Central Oklahoma Edmond Oklahoma USA.
Ying-Yi HongDepartment of Marketing The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong.
Michelle C BlighDivision of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences Claremont Graduate University Claremont California USA.
Maria KakarikaEM Normandie Business School Métis Lab Paris France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented public health crisis that poses a challenge to humanity. Drawing on the stress and coping literature, we argue that people around the world alleviate their anxiety and stress induced by the pandemic through both prosocial and 'self-interested' hoarding behaviours. This cross-cultural survey study examined the pushing (threat perception) and pulling (moral identity) factors that predicted prosocial acts and hoarding, and subsequently psychological well-being. Data were collected from 9 April to 14 May 2020 from 251 participants in the United Kingdom (UK), 268 in the United States (US), 197 in Germany (DE), and 200 in Hong Kong (HK). Whereas threat perception was associated positively with both prosocial acts and hoarding, benevolent moral identity was associated positively with the former but not the latter behaviour. We also observed cross-cultural differences, such that both effects were stronger in more individualistic (UK, US) countries than less individualistic (HK, DE) ones. The findings shed light on the prosocial vs. self-interested behavioural responses of people in different cultures towards the same pandemic crisis.

Indexed as

donationmoral identitypanic buyingpsychological well‐beingstockpilingstress and coping

Identifiers

PMID34230794
PMCPMC8251234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.