Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34230645›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2021

A comparison of chimeric antigen receptors containing CD28 versus 4-1BB costimulatory domains.

Kathryn M Cappell, James N Kochenderfer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07502118 (An Open-Label, Multicenter Phase 2-3 Clinical Study of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells), which is not on this map. Cited by 252 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
252citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
23.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07502118 phase2 / phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

An Open-Label, Multicenter Phase 2-3 Clinical Study of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells (Talikabtagene Autoleucel) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Malignancies (NexCAR19)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHealth Institutes of TurkeyRan2025 to 2030Enrolled40ConditionsRelapsed/Refractory B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL), Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), High-grade B-cell Lymphoma (HGBCL)ArmsTalikabtagene Autoleucel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

252 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 369 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

192 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn M CappellHematology Oncology Fellowship Program, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.
James N KochenderferSurgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. kochendj@mail.nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4362-9875
Center for Cancer Research · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Development of Chimeric Antigen Receptors Targeting Multiple MyelomaZIABC011439 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI KOCHENDERFER, JAMES · 2012 to 2025
$9.5M
New Chimeric Antigen Receptors for Treating Hematologic MalignanciesZIABC011417 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI KOCHENDERFER, JAMES · 2011 to 2025
$8.3M
Allogeneic T cells Transduced with an Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen ReceptorZIABC011415 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI KOCHENDERFER, JAMES · 2011 to 2025
$2.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) are engineered proteins designed to target T cells to cancer cells. To effectively activate the T cells in which they are expressed, CARs must contain a costimulatory domain. The CAR T cell products approved for the treatment of B cell lymphomas and/or acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or multiple myeloma incorporate either a CD28-derived or a 4-1BB-derived costimulatory domain. Almost all other clinically tested CARs also use costimulatory domains from CD28 or 4-1BB. In preclinical experiments, cytokine release is usually greater with CARs containing CD28 versus 4-1BB costimulatory domains; however, constructs with either domain confer similar anticancer activity in mouse models. T cell products expressing CARs with either CD28 or 4-1BB costimulatory domains have been highly efficacious in patients with relapsed haematological malignancies, with anti-CD19 products having similar activity regardless of the source of the costimulatory domain. In large-cohort clinical trials, the rates of neurological toxicities have been higher with CD28-costimulated CARs, although this finding is probably the result of a combination of factors rather than due to CD28 signalling alone. Future preclinical and clinical research should aim to compare different costimulatory domains while controlling for confounding variables. Herein, we provide an overview of T cell costimulation by CD28 and 4-1BB and, using the available preclinical and clinical data, compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles associated with CARs containing either costimulatory domain.

Indexed as

CD28 AntigensFemaleHumansMaleReceptors, Chimeric AntigenTumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily, Member 9CD28 AntigensReceptors, Chimeric AntigenTNFRSF9 protein, humanTumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily, Member 9

Identifiers

PMID34230645
OpenAlexW3178325975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.