Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34230611›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2021

The genomic architectures of tumour-adjacent tissues, plasma and saliva reveal evolutionary underpinnings of relapse in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Ping Wu, Chubo Xie, Ling Yang, Yalan Liu, Junfeng Zeng, Xin Li, Xing Fang, Yuhua Fan, Suping Zhao, Ni Kuang and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Field cancerization in breast cancer.The Journal of pathology · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ping WuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Chubo XieDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ling YangGenePlus-Beijing, Beijing, China.
Yalan LiuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Junfeng ZengDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xin LiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xing FangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yuhua FanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Suping ZhaoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ni KuangGenePlus-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Tao XuanGenePlus-Beijing, Beijing, China.
Xuefeng XiaGenePlus-Beijing, Beijing, China.
Xin YiGenePlus-Beijing, Beijing, China.
Yi HuangGenePlus-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Zicheng YuGenePlus-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China. yuzc@geneplus.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1441-1452
Yaoyun TangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China. yaoyuntang@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9877-9195
Central South University · CNChina National GeneBank · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHead and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is characterised by a dismal prognosis; nonetheless, limited studies have unveiled the mechanisms underlying HNSCC relapse.

methodsNext-generation sequencing was performed to identify the somatic mutations in 188 matched samples, including primary tumours, tumour-adjacent tissues (TATs), pre- and post-operative plasma, saliva and peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) from 27 patients. The evolutionary relationship between TATs and tumours were analysed. The dynamic changes of tumour- and TAT-specific mutations in liquid biopsies were monitored together with survival analysis.

resultsAlterations were detected in 27 out of 27 and 19 out of 26 tumours and TATs, respectively. TP53 was the most prevalently mutated gene in TATs. Some TATs shared mutations with primary tumours, while some other TATs were evolutionarily unrelated to tumours. Notably, TP53 mutations in TATs are stringently associated with premalignant transformation and are indicative of worse survival (hazard ratio = 14.01). TAT-specific mutations were also detected in pre- and/or post-operative liquid biopsies and were indicative of disease relapse.

conclusionsTATs might undergo the processes of premalignant transformation, tumorigenesis and eventually relapse by either inheriting tumorigenic mutations from ancestral clones where the tumour originated or gaining private mutations independent of primary tumours. Detection of tumour- and/or TAT-specific genetic alterations in post-operative biopsies shows profound potential in prognostic use.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorEvolution, MolecularHead and Neck NeoplasmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPlasmaPrognosisProspective StudiesSalivaSequence Analysis, DNASquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckBiomarkers, TumorTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID34230611
PMCPMC8438056
OpenAlexW3179020014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.