Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34230576›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of obesity (2005)2021

Learning of food preferences: mechanisms and implications for obesity & metabolic diseases.

Hans-Rudolf Berthoud, Christopher D Morrison, Karen Ackroff, Anthony Sclafani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of obesity (2005), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Models of body weight and fatness regulation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Protein appetite as an integrator in the obesity system: the protein leverage hypothesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hans-Rudolf BerthoudNeurobiology of Nutrition and Metabolism Department, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge, LA, USA. berthohr@pbrc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0787-1709
Christopher D MorrisonNeurobiology of Nutrition and Metabolism Department, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5492-102X
Karen AckroffPsychology Department, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Anthony SclafaniPsychology Department, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA. anthonys@brooklyn.cuny.edu.

Funding

Neural mechanisms controlling food intake and body weight after bariatric surgeryR01DK047348 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI BERTHOUD, HANS-RUDOLF · 1994 to 2018
$5.0M
Carbohydrate Appetite, Fat Appetite and ObesityR37DK031135 · NIDDK · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI SCLAFANI, ANTHONY · 2001 to 2010
$2.9M
CARBOHYDRATE APPETITE, FAT APPETITE, AND OBESITYR01DK031135 · NIDDK · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI ACKROFF, KAREN, SCLAFANI, ANTHONY · 1986 to 2015
$2.0M
Neural circuits coordinating protein intake: Role of FGF21R01DK123083 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI MORRISON, CHRISTOPHER D · 2020 to 2024
$1.6M
FGF21 is an endocrine signal of protein restrictionR01DK105032 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI MORRISON, CHRISTOPHER D · 2016 to 2019
$1.4M
Discovery of Natural Products and Natural Product-Like InhibitorsZ01DK031135 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI BEWLEY, CAROLE · 2007 to 2008
$844k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DK031135NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK031135NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK047348NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK105032NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK123083NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK031135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Omnivores, including rodents and humans, compose their diets from a wide variety of potential foods. Beyond the guidance of a few basic orosensory biases such as attraction to sweet and avoidance of bitter, they have limited innate dietary knowledge and must learn to prefer foods based on their flavors and postoral effects. This review focuses on postoral nutrient sensing and signaling as an essential part of the reward system that shapes preferences for the associated flavors of foods. We discuss the extensive array of sensors in the gastrointestinal system and the vagal pathways conveying information about ingested nutrients to the brain. Earlier studies of vagal contributions were limited by nonselective methods that could not easily distinguish the contributions of subsets of vagal afferents. Recent advances in technique have generated substantial new details on sugar- and fat-responsive signaling pathways. We explain methods for conditioning flavor preferences and their use in evaluating gut-brain communication. The SGLT1 intestinal sugar sensor is important in sugar conditioning; the critical sensors for fat are less certain, though GPR40 and 120 fatty acid sensors have been implicated. Ongoing work points to particular vagal pathways to brain reward areas. An implication for obesity treatment is that bariatric surgery may alter vagal function.

Indexed as

LearningAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFood PreferencesMetabolic DiseasesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLObesity

Identifiers

PMID34230576
PMCPMC8455326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.