Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34230567›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Segmentation of the subcuticular fat body in Apis mellifera females with different reproductive potentials.

Aneta Strachecka, Krzysztof Olszewski, Karolina Kuszewska, Jacek Chobotow, Łukasz Wójcik, Jerzy Paleolog, Michał Woyciechowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Workers ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dead Brood ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aneta StracheckaDepartment of Zoology and Animal Ecology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland. aneta.strachecka@up.lublin.pl.
Krzysztof OlszewskiInstitute of Biological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Karolina KuszewskaInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Jacek ChobotowFaculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin, Poland.
Łukasz WójcikDepartment of Zoology and Animal Ecology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Jerzy PaleologDepartment of Zoology and Animal Ecology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Michał WoyciechowskiInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
University of Life Sciences in Lublin · PLJagiellonian University · PLMaria Curie-Skłodowska University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolution has created different castes of females in eusocial haplodiploids. The difference between them lies in their functions and vulnerability but above all in their reproductive potentials. Honeybee queens are highly fertile. On the other hand, the workers are facultatively sterile. However, rebel workers, i.e. workers that develop in a queenless colony, reproduce more often than normal workers. As a result, the fat body of these bees, which apart from acting as the energy reserve, is also the site of numerous metabolic processes, had to specialize in different functions perfected over millions of years of eusocial evolution. Assuming that the variety of functions manifests itself in the pleomorphic structure of the fat body cells, we predicted that also different parts of the fat body, e.g. from different segments of the abdomen, contain different sets of cells. Such differences could be expected between queens, rebels and normal workers, i.e. females with dramatically different reproductive potentials. We confirmed all these expectations. Although all bees had the same types of cells, their proportion and segmental character corresponded with the caste reproductive potential and physiological characteristics shaped in the evolutionary process. The females with an increased reproductive potential were characterized by the presence of oenocytes in the third tergite and high concentrations of compounds responsible for energy reserves, like glucose, glycogen and triglycerides. Queens had very large trophocytes, especially in the third tergite. Only in workers did we observe intercellular spaces in all the segments of the fat body, as well as high protein concentrations-especially in the sternite. As expected, the rebels combined many features of the queens and normal workers, what with other findings can help understand the ways that led to the origin of different castes in females of eusocial Hymenoptera.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesBody WeightCell NucleusFat BodyFemaleGlucoseGlycogenInsect ProteinsIntegumentary SystemReproductionTriglyceridesGlucoseGlycogenInsect ProteinsTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID34230567
PMCPMC8260796
OpenAlexW3183075906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.