Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34230114›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2021

Phase 1 study of safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of the human telomerase (hTERT)-encoded DNA plasmids INO-1400 and INO-1401 with or without IL-12 DNA plasmid INO-9012 in adult patients with solid tumors.

Robert H Vonderheide, Kimberly A Kraynyak, Anthony F Shields, Autumn J McRee, Jennifer M Johnson, Weijing Sun, Ashish V Chintakuntlawar, Jan Pawlicki, Albert J Sylvester, Trevor McMullan and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Personalizing DNA Cancer Vaccines.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. AnScience immunology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Transcriptomic analysis of the immune response toMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The Past and Future of Inflammation as a Target to Cancer Prevention.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Clinical immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Robert H VonderheideAbramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kimberly A KraynyakInovio Pharmaceuticals, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, USA kim.kraynyak@inovio.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9233-8858
Anthony F ShieldsKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Autumn J McReeUniversity of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jennifer M JohnsonSidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Weijing SunUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Ashish V ChintakuntlawarDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jan PawlickiInovio Pharmaceuticals, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, USA.
Albert J SylvesterInovio Pharmaceuticals, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, USA.
Trevor McMullanInovio Pharmaceuticals, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, USA.
Robert SamuelsInovio Pharmaceuticals, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, USA.
Joseph J KimInovio Pharmaceuticals, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, USA.
David WeinerWistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jean D BoyerInovio Pharmaceuticals, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, USA.
Matthew P MorrowInovio Pharmaceuticals, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, USA.
Laurent HumeauInovio Pharmaceuticals, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jeffrey M SkolnikInovio Pharmaceuticals, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, USA.
Inovio Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USMayo Clinic · USThe Wistar Institute · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and MetastasisP30CA010815 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Luis J Montaner · 1985 to 2026
$75.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA010815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is frequently classified as a 'universal' tumor associated antigen due to its expression in a vast number of cancers. We evaluated plasmid DNA-encoded hTERT as an immunotherapy across nine cancer types.

methodsA phase 1 clinical trial was conducted in adult patients with no evidence of disease following definitive surgery and standard therapy, who were at high risk of relapse. Plasmid DNA encoding one of two hTERT variants (INO-1400 or INO-1401) with or without plasmid DNA encoding interleukin 12 (IL-12) (INO-9012) was delivered intramuscularly concurrent with the application of the CELLECTRA constant-current electroporation device 4 times across 12 weeks. Safety assessments and immune monitoring against native (germline, non-mutated, non-plasmid matched) hTERT antigen were performed. The largest cohort of patients enrolled had pancreatic cancer, allowing for additional targeted assessments for this tumor type.

resultsOf the 93 enrolled patients who received at least one dose, 88 had at least one adverse event; the majority were grade 1 or 2, related to injection site. At 18 months, 54.8% (51/93) patients were disease-free, with median disease-free survival (DFS) not reached by end of study. For patients with pancreatic cancer, the median DFS was 9 months, with 41.4% of these patients remaining disease-free at 18 months. hTERT immunotherapy induced a de novo cellular immune response or enhanced pre-existing cellular responses to native hTERT in 96% (88/92) of patients with various cancer types. Treatment with INO-1400/INO-1401±INO-9012 drove hTERT-specific IFN-γ production, generated hTERT-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing the activation marker CD38, and induced hTERT-specific activated CD8 +CTLs as defined by cells expressing perforin and granzymes. The addition of plasmid IL-12 adjuvant elicited higher magnitudes of cellular responses including IFN-γ production, activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and activated CD8+CTLs. In a subset analysis of pancreatic cancer patients, the presence of immunotherapy-induced activated CD8+ T cells expressing PD-1, granzymes and perforin correlated with survival.

conclusionsPlasmid DNA-encoded hTERT/IL-12 DNA immunotherapy was well-tolerated, immune responses were noted across all tumor types, and a specific CD8+ phenotype increased by the immunotherapy was significantly correlated with survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDNAFemaleHumansImmunotherapyInterleukin-12MaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPlasmidsTelomeraseDNAInterleukin-12Telomerasecellularimmunityimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID34230114
PMCPMC8261871
OpenAlexW3179090427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.