Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34230096›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Global climate disruption and regional climate shelters after the Toba supereruption.

Benjamin A Black, Jean-François Lamarque, Daniel R Marsh, Anja Schmidt, Charles G Bardeen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessing natural global catastrophic risks.Natural hazards (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  9. Global climate disruption and regional climate shelters after the Toba supereruption.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin A BlackEarth and Atmospheric Science, City College of New York, New York, NY 10031; bblack@ccny.cuny.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4585-6438
Jean-François LamarqueClimate and Global Dynamics Lab, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80305.ORCID 0000-0002-4225-5074
Daniel R MarshClimate and Global Dynamics Lab, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80305.ORCID 0000-0001-6699-494X
Anja SchmidtDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8759-2843
Charles G BardeenAtmospheric Chemistry Observations and Modeling Lab, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301.ORCID 0000-0002-5330-2788
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Toba eruption ∼74,000 y ago was the largest volcanic eruption since the start of the Pleistocene and represents an important test case for understanding the effects of large explosive eruptions on climate and ecosystems. However, the magnitude and repercussions of climatic changes driven by the eruption are strongly debated. High-resolution paleoclimate and archaeological records from Africa find little evidence for the disruption of climate or human activity in the wake of the eruption in contrast with a controversial link with a bottleneck in human evolution and climate model simulations predicting strong volcanic cooling for up to a decade after a Toba-scale eruption. Here, we use a large ensemble of high-resolution Community Earth System Model (CESM1.3) simulations to reconcile climate model predictions with paleoclimate records, accounting for uncertainties in the magnitude of Toba sulfur emissions with high and low emission scenarios. We find a near-zero probability of annual mean surface temperature anomalies exceeding 4 °C in most of Africa in contrast with near 100% probabilities of cooling this severe in Asia and North America for the high sulfur emission case. The likelihood of strong decreases in precipitation is low in most of Africa. Therefore, even Toba sulfur release at the upper range of plausible estimates remains consistent with the muted response in Africa indicated by paleoclimate proxies. Our results provide a probabilistic view of the uneven patterns of volcanic climate disruption during a crucial interval in human evolution, with implications for understanding the range of environmental impacts from past and future supereruptions.

Indexed as

human evolutionpaleoclimateTobavolcanism and climate

Identifiers

PMID34230096
PMCPMC8307270
OpenAlexW3179208665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.