Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34230022›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Validation of the German Life-Space Assessment (LSA-D): cross-sectional validation study in urban and rural community-dwelling older adults.

Sandra Angelika Mümken, Paul Gellert, Malte Stollwerck, Julie Lorraine O'Sullivan, Joern Kiselev

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra Angelika MümkenInstitute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany sandra.muemken@charite.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0603-0855
Paul GellertInstitute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7492-7210
Malte StollwerckInstitute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Julie Lorraine O'SullivanInstitute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Joern KiselevDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a German version of the original University of Alabama at Birmingham Study of Aging Life-Space Assessment (LSA-D) for measurement of community mobility in older adults within the past 4 weeks and to evaluate its construct validity for urban and rural populations of older adults.

designCross-sectional validation study.

settingTwo study centres in urban and rural German outpatient hospital settings.

participantsIn total, N=83 community-dwelling older adults were recruited (n=40 from urban and n=43 from rural areas; mean age was 78.5 years (SD=5.4); 49.4% men). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The final version of the translated LSA-D was related to limitations in activities and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL/iADL) as primary outcome measure (primary hypothesis); and with sociodemographic factors, functional mobility, self-rated health, balance confidence and history of falls as secondary outcome measures to obtain construct validity. Further descriptive measurements of health included hand grip strength, screening of cognitive function, comorbidities and use of transportation. To assess construct validity, correlations between LSA-D and the primary and secondary outcome measures were examined for the total sample, and urban and rural subsamples using bivariate regression and multiple adjusted regression models. Descriptive analyses of LSA-D included different scoring methods for each region. All parameters were estimated using non-parametric bootstrapping procedure.

resultsIn the multiple adjusted model for the total sample, number of ADL/iADL limitations (β=-0.26; 95% CI=-0.42 to -0.08), Timed Up and Go Test (β=-0.37; 95% CI=-0.68 to -0.14), shared living arrangements (β=0.22; 95% CI=0.01 to 0.44) and history of falls in the past 6 months (β=-0.22; 95% CI=-0.41 to -0.05) showed significant associations with the LSA-D composite score, while living in urban area (β=-0.19; 95% CI=-0.42 to 0.03) and male gender (β=0.15; 95% CI=-0.04 to 0.35) were not significant.

conclusionThe LSA-D is a valid tool for measuring life-space mobility in German community-dwelling older adults within the past 4 weeks in ambulant urban and rural settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00019023.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingIndependent LivingAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHand StrengthHumansMalePostural BalanceRural PopulationTime and Motion Studiesgeriatric medicinerehabilitation medicinesocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID34230022
PMCPMC8261868
OpenAlexW3180539870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.