Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34230012›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Usability testing of an e-learning resource designed to improve medical students' physical activity prescription skills: a qualitative think-aloud study.

Helen Carter-Roberts, Richard Antbring, Manuela Angioi, Gemma Pugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Helen Carter-RobertsCentre for Sports & Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Richard AntbringCentre for Sports & Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Manuela AngioiCentre for Sports & Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Gemma PughCentre for Sports & Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK g.pugh@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0608-0967

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAn e-learning resource (MEdic GAming, MEGA) was developed based on the contents of the Faculty of Sports and Exercise Medicine exercise prescription booklet. This study aimed to (i) explore medical students' perspectives of physical activity promotion and e-learning and (ii) investigate medical students' response to the design, content and usability of the MEGA e-learning resource.

designQualitative think-aloud interview study.

settingA London medical school.

participants19 undergraduate medical students were interviewed using the think-aloud method while using the e-learning resource concurrently.

resultsIn general, medical students felt current education on physical activity is inadequate and held a strong desire for more teaching on exercise medicine. Students believed the MEGA e-learning resource addressed a gap in their knowledge on physical activity but noted e-learning should not replace face-to-face teaching and suggested physical activity education would be best delivered through a blended learning approach. Students felt such an approach would allow better opportunity to practice physical activity counselling skills with patients while on clinical placement. Students' motivation to engage with the MEGA e-learning resource was positively impacted by aesthetically appealing design and interactive gamification elements such as self-assessment quizzes and visual progress tracking.

conclusionMedical students value the role of physical activity in health but are disappointed by the lack of teaching within the current medical curriculum. E-learning resources, such as MEGA, which contain interactive features are a viable means to integrate physical activity into the undergraduate curriculum but should be supplemented by the opportunity to practice physical activity counselling in-person.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalCurriculumExerciseHumansLondonPrescriptionsUser-Centered DesignUser-Computer Interfacemedical education & trainingpublic healthsports medicine

Identifiers

PMID34230012
PMCPMC8261869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.