Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34229716›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in zoology2021

Southeast Asian clearwing moths buzz like their model bees.

Marta Skowron Volponi, Luca Pietro Casacci, Paolo Volponi, Francesca Barbero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta Skowron VolponiLaboratory of Evolutionary Biology and Insect Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bialystok, Ciołkowskiego 1J, 15-245, Białystok, Poland. m.skowronvolponi@uwb.edu.pl.
Luca Pietro CasacciDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Via Accademia Albertina 13, 10123, Torino, Italy. luca.casacci@unito.it.
Paolo VolponiClearWing Foundation for Biodiversity, Podczaszyńskiego 11/15 m 23A, 01-866, Warsaw, Poland.
Francesca BarberoDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Via Accademia Albertina 13, 10123, Torino, Italy.
Accademia Albertina delle Belle Arti · ITFoundation for Polish Science · PLUniversity of Białystok · PLUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

ClearWing Foundation for Biodiversity ClearWing Foundation for BiodiversityFundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej START 78.2020Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2019/32/C/NZ8/00523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe endless struggle to survive has driven harmless species to evolve elaborate strategies of deceiving predators. Batesian mimicry involves imitations of noxious species' warning signals by palatable mimics. Clearwing moths (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae), incapable of inflicting painful bites or stings, resemble bees or wasps in their morphology and sometimes imitate their behaviours. An entirely unexplored type of deception in sesiids is acoustic mimicry. We recorded the buzzing sounds of two species of Southeast Asian clearwing moths, Heterosphecia pahangensis and H. hyaloptera and compared them to their visual model bee, Tetragonilla collina, and two control species of bees occurring in the same habitat. Recordings were performed on untethered, flying insects in nature.

resultsBased on eight acoustic parameters and wingbeat frequencies calculated from slow-motion videos, we found that the buzzes produced by both clearwing moths highly resemble those of T. collina but differ from the two control species of bees.

conclusionsAcoustic similarities to bees, alongside morphological and behavioural imitations, indicate that clearwing moths display multimodal mimicry of their evolutionary models.

Indexed as

Acoustic mimicry-aposematism-behavioural ecology-hymenopteran mimicry-predator prey interactions-Sesiidae

Identifiers

PMID34229716
PMCPMC8262067
OpenAlexW3182577395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.