Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34229612›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

Consensus clustering applied to multi-omics disease subtyping.

Galadriel Brière, Élodie Darbo, Patricia Thébault, Raluca Uricaru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ensemble clustering: A practical tutorial.Behavior research methods · 2026
    Article
  2. Multi-modal learning with incomplete data.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CSIE: cancer subtyping via inference and ensemble.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Galadriel BrièreCNRS, Bordeaux INP, LaBRI, UMR 5800, Univ. Bordeaux, 33400, Talence, France. marie-galadriel.briere@u-bordeaux.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1808-3759
Élodie DarboCNRS, Bordeaux INP, LaBRI, UMR 5800, Univ. Bordeaux, 33400, Talence, France.
Patricia Thébault *CNRS, Bordeaux INP, LaBRI, UMR 5800, Univ. Bordeaux, 33400, Talence, France.
Raluca Uricaru *CNRS, Bordeaux INP, LaBRI, UMR 5800, Univ. Bordeaux, 33400, Talence, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFacing the diversity of omics data and the difficulty of selecting one result over all those produced by several methods, consensus strategies have the potential to reconcile multiple inputs and to produce robust results.

resultsHere, we introduce ClustOmics, a generic consensus clustering tool that we use in the context of cancer subtyping. ClustOmics relies on a non-relational graph database, which allows for the simultaneous integration of both multiple omics data and results from various clustering methods. This new tool conciliates input clusterings, regardless of their origin, their number, their size or their shape. ClustOmics implements an intuitive and flexible strategy, based upon the idea of evidence accumulation clustering. ClustOmics computes co-occurrences of pairs of samples in input clusters and uses this score as a similarity measure to reorganize data into consensus clusters.

conclusionWe applied ClustOmics to multi-omics disease subtyping on real TCGA cancer data from ten different cancer types. We showed that ClustOmics is robust to heterogeneous qualities of input partitions, smoothing and reconciling preliminary predictions into high-quality consensus clusters, both from a computational and a biological point of view. The comparison to a state-of-the-art consensus-based integration tool, COCA, further corroborated this statement. However, the main interest of ClustOmics is not to compete with other tools, but rather to make profit from their various predictions when no gold-standard metric is available to assess their significance. AVAILABILITY: The ClustOmics source code, released under MIT license, and the results obtained on TCGA cancer data are available on GitHub: https://github.com/galadrielbriere/ClustOmics .

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeoplasmsCluster AnalysisConsensusHumansSoftwareConsensus clusteringData integrationDisease subtypingMulti-omic data

Identifiers

PMID34229612
PMCPMC8259015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.