Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34229610›Full record

SynthesisBMC neurology2021

National registry for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review for structuring population registries of motor neuron diseases.

Ingridy Barbalho, Ricardo Valentim, Mário Dourado Júnior, Daniele Barros, Hércules Pedrosa Júnior, Felipe Fernandes, César Teixeira, Thaísa Lima, Jailton Paiva, Danilo Nagem

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Blockchain in Health Information Systems: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Educommunication in Nutrition and Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ingridy BarbalhoLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil. ingridy.marina@lais.huol.ufrn.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5696-4114
Ricardo ValentimLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil. ricardo.valentim@lais.huol.ufrn.br.
Mário Dourado JúniorDepartment of Integrated Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil.
Daniele BarrosLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil. daniele.barros@lais.huol.ufrn.br.
Hércules Pedrosa JúniorLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil.
Felipe FernandesLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil.
César TeixeiraUniv Coimbra, Centre for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra, Department of Informatics Engineering, Coimbra, Portugal.
Thaísa LimaBrazilian Ministry of Health, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Jailton PaivaLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil.
Danilo NagemLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRInstituto Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRMinistério da Saúde · BRUniversity of Coimbra · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis article comprises a systematic review of the literature that aims at researching and analyzing the frequently applied guidelines for structuring national databases of epidemiological surveillance for motor neuron diseases, especially Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).

methodsWe searched for articles published from January 2015 to September 2019 on online databases as PubMed - U.S. National Institutes of Health's National Library of Medicine, Scopus, Science Direct, and Springer. Subsequently, we analyzed studies that considered risk factors, demographic data, and other strategic data for directing techno-scientific research, calibrating public health policies, and supporting decision-making by managers through a systemic panorama of ALS.

results2850 studies were identified. 2400 were discarded for not satisfying the inclusion criteria, and 435 being duplicated or published in books or conferences. Hence, 15 articles were elected. By applying quality criteria, we then selected six studies to compose this review. Such researches featured registries from the American (3), European (2), and Oceania (1) continent. All the studies specified the methods for data capture and the patients' recruitment process for the registers. DISCUSSIONS: From the analysis of the selected papers and reported models, it is noticeable that most studies focused on the prospect of obtaining data to characterize research on epidemiological studies. Demographic data (ID01) are present in all the registries, representing the main collected data category. Furthermore, the general health history (ID02) is present in 50% of the registries analyzed. Characteristics such as access control, confidentiality and data curation. We observed that 50% of the registries comprise a patient-focused web-based self-report system.

conclusionThe development of robust, interoperable, and secure electronic registries that generate value for research and patients presents itself as a solution and a challenge. This systematic review demonstrated the success of a population register requires actions with well-defined development methods, as well as the involvement of various actors of civil society.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisRegistriesHumansMotor Neuron DiseaseAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisGlobal healthMotor neuron diseaseNational databases of epidemiologicalRare disease registries

Identifiers

PMID34229610
PMCPMC8259351
OpenAlexW3178903276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.