SynthesisBMC neurology2021
National registry for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review for structuring population registries of motor neuron diseases.
Synthesis in BMC neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blockchain in Health Information Systems: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Pooled it
- Electronic health records in Brazil: Prospects and technological challenges.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- The Motor Neuron Disease Register for England, Wales, and Northern Ireland: Protocol for a Population Register.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Challenges and opportunities for expediting ALS diagnosis in Alberta, Canada: a human-centred design approach.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Prognostic Factors and Epidemiology of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Southeastern United States.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024Article
- Educommunication in Nutrition and Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the therapeutic effects of rehabilitation therapy on patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-a meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Data Report: Educational pathway addressing food and nutrition in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis on the AVASUS platform.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Digital Alternative Communication for Individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: What We Have.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Digital health solution for monitoring and surveillance of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Brazil.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Translational research in health technologies: A scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis article comprises a systematic review of the literature that aims at researching and analyzing the frequently applied guidelines for structuring national databases of epidemiological surveillance for motor neuron diseases, especially Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).
methodsWe searched for articles published from January 2015 to September 2019 on online databases as PubMed - U.S. National Institutes of Health's National Library of Medicine, Scopus, Science Direct, and Springer. Subsequently, we analyzed studies that considered risk factors, demographic data, and other strategic data for directing techno-scientific research, calibrating public health policies, and supporting decision-making by managers through a systemic panorama of ALS.
results2850 studies were identified. 2400 were discarded for not satisfying the inclusion criteria, and 435 being duplicated or published in books or conferences. Hence, 15 articles were elected. By applying quality criteria, we then selected six studies to compose this review. Such researches featured registries from the American (3), European (2), and Oceania (1) continent. All the studies specified the methods for data capture and the patients' recruitment process for the registers. DISCUSSIONS: From the analysis of the selected papers and reported models, it is noticeable that most studies focused on the prospect of obtaining data to characterize research on epidemiological studies. Demographic data (ID01) are present in all the registries, representing the main collected data category. Furthermore, the general health history (ID02) is present in 50% of the registries analyzed. Characteristics such as access control, confidentiality and data curation. We observed that 50% of the registries comprise a patient-focused web-based self-report system.
conclusionThe development of robust, interoperable, and secure electronic registries that generate value for research and patients presents itself as a solution and a challenge. This systematic review demonstrated the success of a population register requires actions with well-defined development methods, as well as the involvement of various actors of civil society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.