ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2021
Tracking and analysis of discourse dynamics and polarity during the early Corona pandemic in Iran.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drivers of health polarization during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.Science advances · 2025Pooled it
- Spatio-temporal evaluation of social media as a tool for livestock disease surveillance.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Novel informatics approaches to COVID-19 Research: From methods to applications.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2022Article
- COVID-19 Persian Misinformation Detection on Instagram: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has not been long since a new disease called COVID-19 has hit the international community. Unknown nature of the virus, evidence of its adaptability and survival in new conditions, its widespread prevalence and also lengthy recovery period, along with daily notifications of new infection and fatality statistics, have created a wave of fear and anxiety among the public community and authorities. These factors have led to extreme changes in the social discourse in a rather short period of time. The analysis of this discourse is important to reconcile the society and restore ordinary conditions of mental peace and health. Although much research has been done on the disease since its international pandemic, the sociological analysis of the recent public phenomenon, especially in developing countries, still needs attention. We propose a framework for analyzing social media data and news stories oriented around COVID-19 disease. Our research is based on an extensive Persian data set gathered from different social media networks and news agencies in the period of January 21-April 29, 2020. We use the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model and dynamic topic modeling to understand and capture the change of discourse in terms of temporal subjects. We scrutinize the reasons of subject alternations by exploring the related events and adopted practices and policies. The social discourse can highly affect the community morale and polarization. Therefore, we further analyze the polarization in online social media posts, and detect points of concept drift in the stream. Based on the analyzed content, effective guidelines are extracted to shift polarization towards positive. The results show that the proposed framework is able to provide an effective practical approach for cause and effect analysis of the social discourse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.