Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34229028›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)

Cross-cultural adaptation of the painDETECT questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese.

Jéssica Pinto Martins do Rio, Juliana Valentim Bittencourt, Leticia Amaral Corrêa, Rainer Freynhagen, Felipe José Jandre Dos Reis, Tamiris Barbosa de Melo, Diego Galace, Leandro Alberto Calazans Nogueira

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jéssica Pinto Martins do RioInstituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Departamento de Fisioterapia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Juliana Valentim BittencourtCentro Universitário Augusto Motta (UNISUAM), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Leticia Amaral CorrêaCentro Universitário Augusto Motta (UNISUAM), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Rainer FreynhagenBenedictus Hospital Tutzing, Critical Care Medicine, Pain Medicine and Palliative Care, Department of Anaesthesiology, Tutzing, Germany; Technische Universität München, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Department of Anaesthesiology, Munich, Germany.
Felipe José Jandre Dos ReisInstituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Departamento de Fisioterapia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Tamiris Barbosa de MeloSanta Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Departamento de Fisioterapia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Diego GalaceSanta Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Departamento de Fisioterapia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Leandro Alberto Calazans NogueiraInstituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Departamento de Fisioterapia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Centro Universitário Augusto Motta (UNISUAM), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Electronic address: leandro.nogueira@ifrj.edu.br.
Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRIrmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo · BRUniversity Center Augusto Motta · BRTUM Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesNeuropathic pain is common in the general population worldwide and Brazil. The painDETECT questionnaire is a notable instrument for screening on neuropathic pain. A Brazilian version of the painDETECT is necessary to broaden the possibilities of identification of neuropathic pain in the Brazilian population for the proper diagnosis and treatment. The current study aimed to perform the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the painDETECT into the Portuguese language of Brazil.

methodsA cross-cultural adaptation study was conducted in 11 stages according to standard procedures. Descriptive statistics were performed. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach's Alpha test (α).

resultsFour translators, 10 experts, and 30 patients participated in the study. The expert committee adapted five out of nine items (item 2, 3, 6, 8, and 10) to the Brazilian context. The pretesting phase showed good internal consistency (α = 0.74) for the nine items, including the pain pattern and the body chart domains. The Cronbach's α of the instrument with seven descriptor items of pain was 0.83.

conclusionsThe painDETECT was cross-culturally adapted into a Brazilian context and can be used to identify neuropathic components in pain of Brazilian patients. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: PainDETECT is available for Brazilians to identify neuropathic components in pain.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonNeuralgiaBrazilHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsNeuropathic painPsychometricsRehabilitationValidation studies

Identifiers

PMID34229028
PMCPMC9373606
OpenAlexW3180489794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.