Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34228885›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2021

Barrett's esophagus surveillance in a prospective Dutch multi-center community-based cohort of 985 patients demonstrates low risk of neoplastic progression.

Esther Klaver, Angela Bureo Gonzalez, Nahid Mostafavi, Rosalie Mallant-Hent, Lucas C Duits, Bert Baak, Clarisse J M Böhmer, Arnoud H A M van Oijen, Ton Naber, Pieter Scholten and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neoplastic Progression Risk in Females With Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Esther KlaverDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Angela Bureo GonzalezDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nahid MostafaviDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rosalie Mallant-HentDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Flevohospital, Almere, The Netherlands.
Lucas C DuitsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bert BaakDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG Oost, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clarisse J M BöhmerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Arnoud H A M van OijenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nothwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Ton NaberDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
Pieter ScholtenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG West, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sybren L MeijerDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacques J G H M BergmanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Roos E PouwDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4707-1186
ReBus Study Group
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLFlevoziekenhuis · NLGGZ Oost Brabant · NLNoordwest Ziekenhuisgroep · NLOLVG · NLSpaarne Ziekenhuis · NLTergooi · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsBarrett's esophagus (BE) is accompanied by an increased risk of developing esophageal cancer. Accurate risk-stratification is warranted to improve endoscopic surveillance. Most data available on risk factors is derived from tertiary care centers or from cohorts with limited surveillance time or surveillance quality. The aim of this study was to assess endoscopic and clinical risk factors for progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in a large prospective cohort of BE patients from community hospitals supported by an overarching infrastructure to ensure optimal surveillance quality.

methodsA well-defined prospective multicenter cohort study was initiated in six community hospitals in the Amsterdam region in 2003. BE patients were identified by PALGA search and included in a prospective surveillance program with a single endoscopist performing all endoscopies at each hospital. Planning and data collection was performed by experienced research nurses who attended all endoscopies. Endpoint was progression to HGD/EAC.

resultsNine hundred eighty-five patients were included for analysis. During median follow-up of 7.9 years (IQR 4.1-12.5) 67 patients were diagnosed with HGD (n = 28) or EAC (n = 39), progression rate 0.78% per patient-year. As a clinical risk factor age at time of endoscopy was associated with neoplastic progression (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.03-1.08). Maximum Barrett length and low-grade dysplasia (LGD) at baseline were endoscopic predictors of progression (HR 1.15; 95% CI 1.09-1.21 and HR 2.36; 95% CI 1.29-4.33).

conclusionRisk of progression to HGD/EAC in a large, prospective, community-based Barrett's cohort was low. Barrett's length, LGD and age were important risk factors for progression. (www.trialregister.nl NTR1789).

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionAdenocarcinomaAgedBarrett EsophagusEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPopulation SurveillancePrecancerous ConditionsProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRegistriesRisk AssessmentBarrettBarrett's esophagusesophageal adenocarcinomaesophageal cancerfollow-uphigh-grade dysplasiamalignancyneoplastic progressionrisk factorssurveillance

Identifiers

PMID34228885
PMCPMC8498404
OpenAlexW3179190696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.