Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34228870›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2021

Annexin A1 as a potential prognostic biomarker for COVID-19 disease: Case-control study.

Omer Canacik, Ramazan Sabirli, Emel Altintas, Emre Karsli, Denizhan Karis, Buse Kaymaz, Gizem Tukenmez Sabirli, Özgür Kurt, Aylin Koseler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Omer CanacikDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey.
Ramazan SabirliDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey.
Emel AltintasDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Emre KarsliDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey.
Denizhan KarisDepartment of Biophysics, Istinye University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Buse KaymazDepartment of Microbiology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gizem Tukenmez SabirliDepartment of Pediatrics, Harakani State Hospital, Kars, Turkey.
Özgür KurtDepartment of Microbiology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Aylin KoselerDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4832-0436
Kafkas University · TRKent Hastanesi · TRIstinye University · TRMinistry of Health · TRPamukkale University · TRSivas State Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnnexin A1 (AnxA1) is an important endogenous glucocoticoid protein that contributes to the suppression of inflammation by limiting the production of neutrophil and pro-inflammatory cytokines. This study aims to determine the clinical predictivity value of blood AnxA1 levels in patients with mild and severe-critical pneumonia induced by COVID-19.

methodsThis study employed a prospective, case-control study design and was conducted at Ankara Training and Research hospital between 10 February 2021 and 15 March 2021. A total of 74 patients (42 of whom had moderate and 32 of whom had severe/critical cases of COVID-19 disease according to World Health Organization guidelines) and 50 nonsymptomatic healthy volunteers participated in the study. Blood samples were taken from patients at the time of hospital admission, after which serum was isolated. Following the isolation of serum, AnxA1 levels were evaluated using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method.

resultsThe serum AnxA1 levels were measured as 25.5 (18.6-38.6) ng/ml in the control group, 21.2 (14.7-32) ng/ml in the moderate disease group, and 14.8 (9.7-26.8) ng/ml in the severe/critical disease group. Serum AnxA1 levels were significantly lower in the severe/critical disease group compared with the control and moderate disease groups (P = .01 and P = .0001, respectively). Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, a larger area under the curve (AUC) for the serum AnxA1 levels of the control group (AUC = 0.715, 95% CI = 0.626-0.803; P = .0001) was calculated compared with the COVID-19 patient group for the diagnosis of COVID-19 disease. The AnxA1 level was found to be 80% sensitive and 54.1% specific at a cut-off level of 18.5 ng/ml for the diagnosis of COVID-19 disease. Moreover, the AnxA1 level was found to be 69.8% sensitive and 58.1% specific at a cut-off level of 17.2 ng/ml in predicting the need for intensive care unit (ICU) treatment.

conclusionAnxA1 levels may be a beneficial biomarker in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia and in predicting the need for ICU treatment in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia at the time of admission to the emergency department.

Indexed as

Annexin A1COVID-19BiomarkersCase-Control StudiesHumansPrognosisProspective StudiesAnnexin A1ANXA1 protein, humanBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID34228870
PMCPMC8420238
OpenAlexW3179492955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.