Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34228867›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical practice2021

Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Juan R Ulloque-Badaracco, W Ivan Salas-Tello, Ali Al-Kassab-Córdova, Esteban A Alarcón-Braga, Vicente A Benites-Zapata, Jorge L Maguiña, Adrian V Hernandez

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Influence of COVID-19 on Clinical Outcomes ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juan R Ulloque-BadaraccoEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1093-4937
W Ivan Salas-TelloEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5105-4082
Ali Al-Kassab-CórdovaEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3718-5857
Esteban A Alarcón-BragaEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3125-5949
Vicente A Benites-ZapataVicerrectorado de Investigación Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9158-1108
Jorge L MaguiñaEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4136-7795
Adrian V HernandezUnidad de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Meta-análisis, Guías de Práctica Clínica y Evaluaciones de Tecnología Sanitaria, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9999-4003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an accessible and widely used biomarker. NLR may be used as an early marker of poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19.

objectiveTo evaluate the prognostic value of the NLR in patients diagnosed with COVID-19.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Observational studies that reported the association between baseline NLR values (ie, at hospital admission) and severity or all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Random effects models and inverse variance method were used for meta-analyses. The effects were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Small study effects were assessed with the Egger's test.

resultsWe analysed 61 studies (n = 15 522 patients), 58 cohorts, and 3 case-control studies. An increase of one unit of NLR was associated with higher odds of severity (OR 6.22; 95%CI 4.93 to 7.84; P < .001) and higher odds of all-cause mortality (OR 12.6; 95%CI 6.88 to 23.06; P < .001). In our sensitivity analysis, we found that 41 studies with low risk of bias and moderate heterogeneity (I

conclusionsHigher values of NLR were associated with severity and all-cause mortality in hospitalised COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeutrophilsHumansLymphocytesPrognosisSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34228867
PMCPMC9614707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.