Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34228834›Full record

Trial reportScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2021

The socio-economic impact of running-related injuries: A large prospective cohort study.

Tjerk S O Sleeswijk Visser, Marienke van Middelkoop, Tryntsje Fokkema, Robert-Jan de Vos

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessing running stability: a systematic review of methods.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The socio-economic impact of running-related injuries: A large prospective cohort study.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2021
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tjerk S O Sleeswijk VisserDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4483-1936
Marienke van MiddelkoopDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6926-0618
Tryntsje FokkemaLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3767-2770
Robert-Jan de VosDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0372-0188
Erasmus MC · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

ZonMw 536001001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the impact of running-related injuries (RRIs) on activities of daily living (ADL), work, healthcare utilization, and estimated costs.

designProspective cohort study with data from a randomized controlled trial.

methodsAdult recreational runners who registered for a running event (distances 5 to 42 km) were included in this study. Minimum follow-up duration was 3 months (preparation, event participation, and post-race period). Injuries were registered using a standardized definition. Primary outcome measure was a standardized 5-item survey on limitations in ADL. The survey data were categorized to the number of injured runners with complete/moderate/no limitations. This outcome was expressed as the percentage of injured runners with any limitation (complete or moderate limitations amalgamated). Secondary outcomes were work absenteeism, the number of healthcare visits per injured runner, and estimated direct medical and indirect costs per participant and per RRI.

results1929 runners (mean [SD] age 41 [12] years, 53% men) were included in this study and 883 runners (46%) sustained a RRI during the course of the study. Injured runners reported the highest limitations (% with any limitation) of RRIs during the first week of injury on sports and leisure activities (70%) and transportation activities (23%). 39% of the injured runners visited a healthcare professional. Work absenteeism due to the RRI was reported in 5% of the injured runners. The total mean estimated costs were €74 per RRI and €35 per participant.

conclusionsInjured runners are mainly limited in their transportation activities and during sports and leisure. While the estimated costs of RRIs are not high when expressed per participant, the absolute costs may be substantial due to the popularity of running.

Indexed as

AbsenteeismActivities of Daily LivingPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAthletic InjuriesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRunningSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and Questionnairesactivities of daily livingepidemiologyrunningwork

Identifiers

PMID34228834
PMCPMC8518541
OpenAlexW3180917271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.