Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34228822›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2022

Impact of adenomyosis on the prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer.

Diego Raimondo, Antonio Raffone, Antonio Travaglino, Manuela Maletta, Paolo Casadio, Marco Ambrosio, Anna Chiara Aru, Angela Santoro, Gian Franco Zannoni, Luigi Insabato and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of adenomyosis on the prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Adenomyosis as a Risk Factor for Myometrial or Endometrial Neoplasms-Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Effect of adenomyosis on prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Diego RaimondoDivision of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Antonio RaffoneDivision of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Antonio TravaglinoPathology Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Manuela MalettaDivision of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Paolo CasadioDivision of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Marco AmbrosioDivision of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Anna Chiara AruDivision of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Angela SantoroPathology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Gian Franco ZannoniPathology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Luigi InsabatoPathology Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Antonio MolloDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Salerno, Italy.
Fulvio ZulloGynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Renato SeracchioliDivision of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversity of Salerno · ITUniversity of the Sacred Heart · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the high prevalence of adenomyosis in hysterectomy specimens of endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients, the relationship between adenomyosis and EC prognosis appears unclear.

objectiveTo assess the prognostic value of coexistent adenomyosis in patients with EC.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching six electronic databases for studies reporting data on prognosis of EC patients with and without coexistent adenomyosis. Studies with patient selection based on prognostic factors were excluded. Pooled univariate hazard ratio (HR) analyses for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DRF) were performed, using EC patients without adenomyosis as a control group. For DFS, pooled multivariate HR analysis was also evaluable.

resultsThree studies of 2505 EC patients (553 with and 1952 without adenomyosis) were included. Compared with EC patients without adenomyosis, EC patients with coexistent adenomyosis showed a pooled HR of 0.533 (CI 95%, 0.329-0.864) for OS at univariate analysis; 0.536 (CI 95%, 0.334-0.859) for DFS at univariate analysis; and 0.875 (CI 95%, 0.331-2.315) for DFS at multivariate analysis.

conclusionIn EC patients with coexistent adenomyosis, the risk of death is halved compared with EC patients without adenomyosis. However, the independence of this association needs to be verified in future studies.

Indexed as

AdenomyosisEndometrial NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansPrognosisProgression-Free Survivalendometriumgynecologymalignancymyometriumoncologytumor

Identifiers

PMID34228822
PMCPMC9292168
OpenAlexW3182939685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.