Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34228714›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Assessing clinicians' Post-Exposure Prophylaxis recommendations for rabies virus exposures in Hunan Province, China.

Yu Li, Jeanette J Rainey, Hao Yang, Cuc H Tran, Yang Huai, Rongqiang Liu, Hongwei Zhu, Zhengliang Wang, Di Mu, Wenwu Yin and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu LiDivision of Infectious Disease, Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Early-Warning on Infectious Disease, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Jeanette J RaineyDivision of Global Health Protection, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Hao YangHunan Province Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha, China.
Cuc H TranDivision of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Yang HuaiDivision of Global Health Protection, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Rongqiang LiuShuangfeng Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shuangfeng, China.
Hongwei ZhuShuangfeng Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shuangfeng, China.
Zhengliang WangShuangfeng Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shuangfeng, China.
Di MuDivision of Infectious Disease, Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Early-Warning on Infectious Disease, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Wenwu YinDivision of Infectious Disease, Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Early-Warning on Infectious Disease, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Chun GuoSchool of Public Health, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1884-8814
Miriam ShiferawDivision of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Qiulan ChenDivision of Infectious Disease, Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Early-Warning on Infectious Disease, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6711-2304
Shixiong HuHunan Province Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha, China.
Zhongjie LiDivision of Infectious Disease, Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Early-Warning on Infectious Disease, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CNCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USHunan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U2G GH000961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely and appropriate administration of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an essential component of human rabies prevention programs. We evaluated patient care at rabies clinics in a high-risk county in Hunan Province, China to inform strategies needed to achieve dog-mediated human rabies elimination by 2030.

methodsWe collected information on PEP, staff capacity, and service availability at the 17 rabies clinics in the high-risk county during onsite visits and key staff interviews. Additionally, we conducted observational assessments at five of these clinics, identified through purposive sampling to capture real-time information on patient care during a four-week period. Wound categories assigned by trained observers were considered accurate per national guidelines for comparison purposes. We used the kappa statistic and an alpha level of 0.05 to assess agreement between observers and clinic staff.

resultsIn 2015, the 17 clinics provided PEP to 5,261 patients. Although rabies vaccines were available at all 17 clinics, rabies immune globulin (RIG) was only available at the single urban clinic in the county. During the assessment period in 2016, 196 patients sought care for possible rabies virus exposures. According to observers, 88 (44%) patients had category III wounds, 104 (53%) had category II wounds and 4 (2%) had category I wounds. Observers and PEP clinic staff agreed on approximately half of the assigned wound categories (kappa = 0.55, p-value< 0.001). Agreement for the urban county-level CDC clinic (kappa = 0.93, p-value<0.001) was higher than for the township clinics (kappa = 0.16, p-value = 0.007). Using observer assigned wound categories, 142 (73%) patients received rabies vaccinations and RIG as outlined in the national guidelines.

conclusionRabies PEP services were available at each town of the project county; however, gaps between clinical practice and national rabies guidelines on the use of PEP were identified. We used these findings to develop and implement a training to rabies clinic staff on wound categorization, wound care, and appropriate use of PEP. Additional risk-based approaches for evaluating human rabies virus exposures may be needed as China progresses towards elimination.

Indexed as

Post-Exposure ProphylaxisRabies virusAdolescentAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAnimalsBites and StingsCatsChildChild, PreschoolChinaDogsFemaleHumansInfantMaleRabies Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34228714
PMCPMC8284641
OpenAlexW3177778034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.