Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34228379›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council2022

Differences in maternal and early child nutritional status by offspring sex in lowland Nepal.

Naomi M Saville, Helen Harris-Fry, Akanksha Marphatia, Alice Reid, Mario Cortina-Borja, Dharma S Manandhar, Jonathan C Wells

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Differences in maternal and early child nutritional status by offspring sex in lowland Nepal.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Naomi M SavilleInstitute for Global Health (IGH), University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1735-3684
Helen Harris-FryDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Akanksha MarphatiaDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Alice ReidDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Mario Cortina-BorjaSection of Clinical Epidemiology, Nutrition and Biostatistics, Population Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Dharma S ManandharMother and Infant Research Activities (MIRA), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Jonathan C WellsSection of Clinical Epidemiology, Nutrition and Biostatistics, Population Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0411-8025
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMother and Infant Research Activities · NPThe George Institute for Global Health · GB

Funding

Department of Health RPG-2017-264Wellcome Trust 210894/Z/18/ZWellcome Trust 210894/Z/18/Z (Helen Harris-Fry)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOn average, boys grow faster than girls in early life but appear more susceptible to undernutrition. We investigated sex differences in early child growth, and whether maternal nutritional status and diet differed by offspring sex during and after pregnancy in an undernourished population.

methodsWe analyzed longitudinal data from a cluster-randomized trial from plains Nepal, stratifying results by child or gestational age. Children's outcomes (0-20 months) were weight, length, and head circumference and their z-scores relative to WHO reference data in 2-monthly intervals (n range: 24837 to 25 946). Maternal outcomes were mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), and body mass index (BMI) during pregnancy (12-40 weeks) (n = 5550 and n = 5519) and postpartum (n = 15 710 and n = 15 356), and diet in pregnancy. We fitted unadjusted and adjusted mixed-effects linear and logistic regression models comparing boys with girls.

resultsBoys were larger than girls, however relative to their sex-specific reference they had lower length and head circumference z-scores from birth to 12 months, but higher weight-for-length z-scores from 0 to 6 months. Mothers of sons had higher MUAC and BMI around 36 weeks gestation but no other differences in pregnancy diets or pregnancy/postpartum maternal anthropometry were detected. Larger sex differences in children's size in the food supplementation study arm suggest that food restriction in pregnancy may limit fetal growth of boys more than girls.

conclusionsGenerally, mothers' anthropometry and dietary intake do not differ according to offspring sex. As boys are consistently larger, we expect that poor maternal nutritional status may compromise their growth more than girls. Copyright © 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Indexed as

Maternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutritional StatusAnthropometryBirth WeightBody Mass IndexChildFemaleHumansMaleNepalPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34228379
PMCPMC12086752
OpenAlexW3181784485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.