Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34228304›Full record

ArticleHuman nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)2021

Parental Investment Is Biased toward Children Named for Their Fathers.

Gabriel Šaffa, Zuzana Štěrbová, Pavol Prokop

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. In-Law Preferences for Similarity: Comparing Parent and Child Preferences for In-Law/Intimate Partner Similarity.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Gabriel ŠaffaDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. gabriel.saffa@azet.sk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2618-6424
Zuzana ŠtěrbováDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Celetná 20, 116 42, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0158-922X
Pavol ProkopDepartment of Environmental Ecology and Landscape Management, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina B2 418, 842 15, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2016-7468
Charles University · CZInstitute of Chemistry of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKSewanee: The University of the South · US

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky GAČR 18-15168SJihočeská Univerzita v Českých Budějovicích GAJU 04-048/2019/PMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy NPU I programSustainability for the National Institute of Mental Health LO1611Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV VEGA 1/0286/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Namesaking (naming a child after a parent or other relative) can be viewed as a mechanism to increase perceived parent-child similarity and, consequently, parental investment. Male and, to a lesser extent, firstborn children are more frequently namesakes than female and later-born children, respectively. However, a direct link between namesaking and parental investment has not been examined. In the present study, 632 participants (98 men and 534 women) from Central Europe indicated their first name, sex, birth order, number of siblings, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, paternal and maternal first names, as well as relationship quality with, and time and financial investment they received from, both parents during childhood. Mixed-effects models revealed associations between namesaking and parental investment. However, the effect of namesaking often appeared significant only in interaction with specific predictors, such as sex and primogeniture. It suggests instead that namesaking has an additive effect-it enhances the effect of biological factors on parental investment. In general, we found evidence for the bias in parental investment linked to name similarity among both parents, and support for the hypothesis that namesaking serves as a mechanism to increase paternity confidence and, thus, paternal investment. The effect of namesaking influences only certain types of parental investment-namely, those at the level of relationship quality. In addition, nonheterosexual orientation was the strongest negative predictor of paternal investment. Our study extends the research on parental investment by showing that cultural mechanisms, such as namesaking, can also exert some influence on parental rearing behavior.

Indexed as

FathersParentsBirth OrderFamily RelationsFemaleHumansMalePaternityNamesakeName similarity biasParental investmentPaternity uncertaintyRelationship qualitySexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID34228304
OpenAlexW3179225054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.