Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34228223›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2021

Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of tendinous foot involvement in rheumatoid arthritis.

Pilar Macarrón Pérez, María Del Rosario Morales Lozano, Cristina Vadillo Font, Lidia Abásolo Alcázar, Carmen Martínez Rincón, Benjamin Fernández Gutiérrez, Margarita Blanco Hontiyuelo, María Luz González-Fernández

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Key Considerations When Targeting a Heel Spur.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pilar Macarrón PérezRheumatology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
María Del Rosario Morales LozanoFaculty of the E.F.Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. rmorales@ucm.es.
Cristina Vadillo FontRheumatology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Lidia Abásolo AlcázarRheumatology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen Martínez RincónFaculty of the E.F.Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Benjamin Fernández GutiérrezRheumatology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Margarita Blanco HontiyueloRheumatology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
María Luz González-FernándezFaculty of the E.F.Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with rheumatoid arthritis frequently consult for pain resulting from involvement of the tendons of the foot. This pain negatively affects foot biomechanics and quality of life. The most widely used treatment option for this condition is ultrasound-guided steroid injection, while other treatments were recommended such as heel pad, splints, and footwear.

objectiveTo evaluate a joint intervention (rheumatology and podiatry) comprising an orthotic-podiatric treatment and infiltrations. We evaluated the response using ultrasound monitoring, a pain scale, functional tests, and assessment of patient satisfaction.

methodsWe performed a non-controlled blinded prospective interventional study of 96 patients with foot pain and selected those with ultrasound-confirmed tendon involvement. Patients enrolled started intervention treatment and were followed for 6 months. The outcome of the intervention was compared with the patient's baseline status. The pre-post differences in the secondary variables (pain, disability) were analyzed using the t test and contingency tables or the Mann-Whitney test.

resultsUsing our protocol, we recorded a rapid and significant reduction in the intensity of pain, in the foot function index, and in the ultrasound parameters (grayscale and Doppler). Structural damage to the tendon improved more slowly, with significant outcomes only at the last visit with respect to baseline. Abnormal foot support was detected in 50% of patients, and 79.5% were using inappropriate footwear.

conclusionsOur multidisciplinary therapeutic protocol enabled a very significant improvement in tendon involvement. It was well-tolerated, with a high degree of satisfaction, and was easily evaluated using ultrasound. No changes in background medication were necessary. Key Points • Multidisciplinary evaluation of patients with RA is advisable because it improves the treatment management in cases of inflammatory activity and structural abnormalities of the foot. • Comprising orthopedic-podiatric treatment (heel, splints, and suitable footwear) and infiltrations, in terms of clinical, ultrasound, and functional recovery of the foot tendons. • The therapy protocol we propose led to a significant improvement in pain relief and functional recovery.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidPodiatryHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTendonsOrthotic-podiatric treatmentPosterior tibial tendinitisRheumatic footUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID34228223
PMCPMC8599255
OpenAlexW3180913330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.