ArticleArchives of microbiology2021
DNA metabarcoding of the leachate microbiota from sanitary landfill: potential for bioremediation process.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DNA Metabarcoding from Microbial Communities Recovered from Stream and Its Potential for Bioremediation Processes.Current microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leachate generation contains a variety of toxic compounds, and is a major problem for municipal solid waste (MSW). Microbial profile knowledge is essential to new alternatives and improvements in current treatments of these effluents. In this respect, the microbial community in the leachate from the sanitary landfill of the city of Foz do Iguaçu was analyzed. The 16S rDNA metabarcoding suggested the dominance of fermenting bacteria belonging to Firmicutes phylum, followed by Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Synergistetes. The most abundant genera were Sedimentibacter, Vulcanibacillus, and Anaerovorax. However, 60% of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were not classified taxonomically. In addition, an expressive abundance was attributed to the superphylum known as PVC group, little studied and with unknown scientific potential. The leachate acidogenic phase was masked in the chemical and physical analyzes. Nevertheless, it was evidenced in the metabarcoding methodology. No specifically methanogenic group was detected in significant abundance. Therefore, from bacterial community identification, a bioremediation process can be designed. Enriched culture media can be developed and targeted to the recovery of specific groups which may be involved in leachate biodegradation. What is more, the results expand the knowledge of bacterial diversity, especially from the presence of unknown genera in this habitat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34228134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.