ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
Deep Learning Applied to Automated Segmentation of Geographic Atrophy in Fundus Autofluorescence Images.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection and Management of Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using Noninvasive Retinal Images and Artificial Intelligence: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of effectiveness of geographic atrophy automatic segmentation with different imaging methods.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- OCT in Oncology and Precision Medicine: From Nanoparticles to Advanced Technologies and AI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Geographic Atrophy Segmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Rethinking Clinical Trials in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: How AI-Based OCT Analysis Can Support Successful Outcomes.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in assessing progression of age-related macular degeneration.Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- Quantifying Geographic Atrophy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Comparative Analysis Across 12 Deep Learning Models.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- AI-based support for optical coherence tomography in age-related macular degeneration.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2024Review
- Geographic Atrophy Segmentation Using Multimodal Deep Learning.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Clinical validation for automated geographic atrophy monitoring on OCT under complement inhibitory treatment.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Application of Machine Learning to Ranking Predictors of Anti-VEGF Response.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Longitudinal Comparison of Geographic Atrophy Enlargement Using Manual, Semiautomated, and Deep Learning Approaches.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
- Strong versus Weak Data Labeling for Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in the Measurement of Geographic Atrophy.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study describes the development of a deep learning algorithm based on the U-Net architecture for automated segmentation of geographic atrophy (GA) lesions in fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images. Methods: Image preprocessing and normalization by modified adaptive histogram equalization were used for image standardization to improve effectiveness of deep learning. A U-Net-based deep learning algorithm was developed and trained and tested by fivefold cross-validation using FAF images from clinical datasets. The following metrics were used for evaluating the performance for lesion segmentation in GA: dice similarity coefficient (DSC), DSC loss, sensitivity, specificity, mean absolute error (MAE), accuracy, recall, and precision. Results: In total, 702 FAF images from 51 patients were analyzed. After fivefold cross-validation for lesion segmentation, the average training and validation scores were found for the most important metric, DSC (0.9874 and 0.9779), for accuracy (0.9912 and 0.9815), for sensitivity (0.9955 and 0.9928), and for specificity (0.8686 and 0.7261). Scores for testing were all similar to the validation scores. The algorithm segmented GA lesions six times more quickly than human performance. Conclusions: The deep learning algorithm can be implemented using clinical data with a very high level of performance for lesion segmentation. Automation of diagnostics for GA assessment has the potential to provide savings with respect to patient visit duration, operational cost and measurement reliability in routine GA assessments. Translational Relevance: A deep learning algorithm based on the U-Net architecture and image preprocessing appears to be suitable for automated segmentation of GA lesions on clinical data, producing fast and accurate results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.