Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34228106›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021

Deep Learning Applied to Automated Segmentation of Geographic Atrophy in Fundus Autofluorescence Images.

Janan Arslan, Gihan Samarasinghe, Arcot Sowmya, Kurt K Benke, Lauren A B Hodgson, Robyn H Guymer, Paul N Baird

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Geographic Atrophy Segmentation Using Multimodal Deep Learning.Translational vision science & technology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Janan ArslanCentre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Gihan SamarasingheSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Arcot SowmyaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Kurt K BenkeSchool of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Lauren A B HodgsonCentre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Robyn H GuymerCentre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Paul N BairdDepartment of Surgery, Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUUNSW Sydney · AUCentre for Eye Research Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study describes the development of a deep learning algorithm based on the U-Net architecture for automated segmentation of geographic atrophy (GA) lesions in fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images. Methods: Image preprocessing and normalization by modified adaptive histogram equalization were used for image standardization to improve effectiveness of deep learning. A U-Net-based deep learning algorithm was developed and trained and tested by fivefold cross-validation using FAF images from clinical datasets. The following metrics were used for evaluating the performance for lesion segmentation in GA: dice similarity coefficient (DSC), DSC loss, sensitivity, specificity, mean absolute error (MAE), accuracy, recall, and precision. Results: In total, 702 FAF images from 51 patients were analyzed. After fivefold cross-validation for lesion segmentation, the average training and validation scores were found for the most important metric, DSC (0.9874 and 0.9779), for accuracy (0.9912 and 0.9815), for sensitivity (0.9955 and 0.9928), and for specificity (0.8686 and 0.7261). Scores for testing were all similar to the validation scores. The algorithm segmented GA lesions six times more quickly than human performance. Conclusions: The deep learning algorithm can be implemented using clinical data with a very high level of performance for lesion segmentation. Automation of diagnostics for GA assessment has the potential to provide savings with respect to patient visit duration, operational cost and measurement reliability in routine GA assessments. Translational Relevance: A deep learning algorithm based on the U-Net architecture and image preprocessing appears to be suitable for automated segmentation of GA lesions on clinical data, producing fast and accurate results.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGeographic AtrophyAlgorithmsHumansOptical ImagingReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID34228106
PMCPMC8267211
OpenAlexW3180297112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.