Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34228103›Full record

ArticleBJS open2021

Cardiac risk stratification in emergency resection for colonic tumours.

G A Bass, M Forssten, A Pourlotfi, R Ahl Hulme, Y Cao, P Matthiessen, S Mohseni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Practice patterns and clinical outcomes in acute appendicitis differ in the elderly patient.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Mortality risk stratification in isolated severe traumatic brain injury using the revised cardiac risk index.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

G A BassSchool of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1918-9443
M ForsstenSchool of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.
A PourlotfiSchool of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.
R Ahl HulmeSchool of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.
Y CaoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3552-9153
P MatthiessenSchool of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.
S MohseniSchool of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7097-487X
Örebro University · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEPenn Presbyterian Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite advances in perioperative care, the postoperative mortality rate after emergency oncological colonic resection remains high. Risk stratification may allow targeted perioperative optimization and cardiac risk stratification. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), a user-friendly tool, could identify patients who would benefit most from perioperative cardiac risk mitigation.

methodsPatients who underwent emergency resection for colonic cancer from 2007 to 2017 and registered in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR) were analysed retrospectively. These patients were cross-referenced by social security number to the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare data set, a government registry of mortality, and co-morbidity data. RCRI scores were calculated for each patient and correlated with 90-day postoperative mortality risk, using Poisson regression with robust error of variance.

resultsSome 5703 patients met the study inclusion criteria. A linear increase in crude 90-day postoperative mortality was detected with increasing RCRI score (37.3 versus 11.3 per cent for RCRI 4 or more versus RCRI 1; P < 0.001). The adjusted 90-day all-cause mortality risk was also significantly increased (RCRI 4 or more versus RCRI 1: adjusted incidence rate ratio 2.07, 95 per cent c.i. 1.49 to 2.89; P < 0.001).

conclusionThis study documented an association between increasing cardiac risk and 90-day postoperative mortality. Those undergoing emergency colorectal surgery for cancer with a raised RCRI score should be considered high-risk patients who would most likely benefit from enhanced postoperative monitoring and critical care expertise.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34228103
PMCPMC8259498
OpenAlexW3181118410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.