Trial reportJAMA2021
Effect of Cytisine vs Varenicline on Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence-based consensus guidelines for the pharmacological management of substance dependence: Recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2026Guideline
- The efficacy and acceptability of pharmacological monotherapies and e-cigarette on smoking cessation: a systemic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Pooled it
- Pharmacological and electronic cigarette interventions for smoking cessation in adults: component network meta-analyses.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- The clinical usefulness of knowingTumori · 2026Trial
- Varenicline and Nicotine Replacement Therapy for Smokers Admitted to Hospitals: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Cytisine in Combination with a Community Pharmacists' Counselling for Smoking Cessation in Thailand: A Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Effectiveness of Varenicline and Cytisine for Alcohol Use Reduction Among People With HIV and Substance Use: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Nurse-led smoking cessation with cytisinicline in primary care: An intervention study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Awareness, use and future interest in cytisine for smoking cessation in adults who smoke or have quit within the past year in the UK: A mixed-methods study.Addictive behaviors reports · 2026Article
- Neuropharmacology of Nicotine Addiction and Therapeutic Strategies for Smoking Cessation.Biology · 2026Review
- Utilization and adherence to smoking cessation pharmacotherapy: A population-based study in Spain.Atencion primaria · 2026Observational
- Narrative Review of Novel Nicotine-Delivery Systems and Emerging Pharmaceuticals for Tobacco Cessation.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cytisine-New Challenges of a Well-Known Drug in the Treatment of Nicotine Addiction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Efficacy, Safety, and Economic Impact of Cytisinicline Maintenance Therapy in Patients Who Are Candidates for Smoking Cessation: Protocol for a Phase IV, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled, Parallel Clinical Trial (CITISILONG Trial).JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Cytisinicline and Varenicline for Smoking Cessation: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison (MAIC).Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2026Article
- Psychological outcomes of smoking cessation supported by telemedicine in real-world clinical practice: A prospective longitudinal cohort study.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
- Cytisine Use Vs Nicotine Replacement Therapy in Relapsed Smokers with Heart Disease: Feasibility Results from a Pilot Randomized Trial.CJC open · 2025Article
- Cytisinicline vs. Varenicline in Tobacco Addiction: A Literature Review Focused on Emotional Regulation, Psychological Symptoms, and Mental Health.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
23 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Cytisine is more effective than placebo and nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. However, cytisine has not been tested against the most effective smoking cessation medication, varenicline, which is associated with adverse events known to lead to discontinuation of therapy. Objective: To examine whether standard cytisine treatment (25 days) was at least as effective as standard varenicline treatment (84 days) for smoking cessation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This noninferiority, open-label randomized clinical trial with allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment was undertaken in Australia from November 2017 through May 2019; follow-up was completed in January 2020. A total of 1452 Australian adult daily smokers willing to make a quit attempt were included. Data collection was conducted primarily by computer-assisted telephone interview, but there was an in-person visit to validate the primary outcome. Interventions: Treatments were provided in accordance with the manufacturers' recommended dosage: cytisine (n = 725), 1.5-mg capsules taken 6 times daily initially then gradually reduced over the 25-day course; varenicline (n = 727), 0.5-mg tablets titrated to 1 mg twice daily for 84 days (12 weeks). All participants were offered referral to standard telephone behavioral support. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 6-month continuous abstinence verified using a carbon monoxide breath test at 7-month follow-up. The noninferiority margin was set at 5% and the 1-sided significance threshold was set at .025. Results: Among 1452 participants who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 42.9 [12.7] years; 742 [51.1%] women), 1108 (76.3%) completed the trial. Verified 6-month continuous abstinence rates were 11.7% for the cytisine group and 13.3% for the varenicline group (risk difference, -1.62% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -5.02% to ∞]; P = .03 for noninferiority). Self-reported adverse events occurred less frequently in the cytisine group (997 events among 482 participants) compared with the varenicline group (1206 events among 510 participants) and the incident rate ratio was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.95; P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance: Among daily smokers willing to quit, cytisine treatment for 25 days, compared with varenicline treatment for 84 days, failed to demonstrate noninferiority regarding smoking cessation. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616001654448.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.