ArticleInfection and immunity2021
Development of Combination Vaccine Conferring Optimal Protection against Six Pore-Forming Toxins of Staphylococcus aureus.
Article in Infection and immunity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diversity and evolution of leukotoxin operons inmSystems · 2026Article
- Overcoming Immune Evasion inACS infectious diseases · 2025Review
- A promisingClinical and experimental vaccine research · 2025Review
- Bacterial exotoxins in medicine: potential value and perspectives.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- Protective effects of immunization with a novel 4 recombinant pore-forming toxoid combination vaccine in a rabbit model of systemic methicillin-resistantClinical and experimental vaccine research · 2024Article
- The Relative Importance of Cytotoxins Produced by Methicillin-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- In silico designed Staphylococcus aureus B-cell multi-epitope vaccine did not elicit antibodies against target antigens suggesting multi-domain approach.Journal of immunological methods · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In the Gram-positive pathogen Staphylococcus aureus, pore-forming toxins (PFTs), such as leukocidins and hemolysins, play prominent roles in staphylococcal pathogenesis by killing host immune cells and red blood cells (RBCs). However, it remains unknown which combination of toxin antigens would induce the broadest protective immune response against those toxins. In this study, by targeting six major staphylococcal PFTs (i.e., gamma-hemolysin AB [HlgAB], gamma-hemolysin CB [HlgCB], leukocidin AB [LukAB], leukocidin ED [LukED], Panton-Valentine leukocidin [LukSF-PV], and alpha-hemolysin [Hla]), we generated 10 recombinant toxins or toxin subunits, 3 toxoids, and their rabbit antibodies. Using the cytolytic assay for RBCs and polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs), we determined the best combination of toxin antibodies conferring the broadest protection against those staphylococcal PFTs. Although anti-HlgA IgG (HlgA-IgG) showed low cross-reactivity to other toxin components, it was essential to protect rabbit and human RBCs and human PMNs. For the protection of rabbit RBCs, Hla
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.