ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2021
[Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography for removal of pesticide residues in ginseng extracts].
Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Preparation of a novel polyhydroxy silica stationary phase and application in the separation of alginate oligosaccharides].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2026Article
- [Determination of 79 pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables by QuEChERS-ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ginseng extracts are rich in a variety of ginseng monomer saponins, which have pharmacological functions of retarding aging, enhancing immunity, stimulating blood circulation, and lowering blood pressure. Ginseng is widely used in health products and dietary supplements in the domestic and foreign market. However, the amount of pesticide residues is an important index for measuring the quality of ginseng and ginseng extracts. Therefore, studies focused on methods for the removal of pesticide residues in ginseng extract are of great significance. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) is used to improve the retention and separation selectivity of strongly polar substances, and it is widely employed in drug analysis, metabolomics, proteomics, etc. In this study, a method for the removal of pesticide residues was developed based on the difference in the retention behavior of pesticide residues and ginsenosides on the HILIC column. Using commercially available ginsenoside extracts, the retention behaviors of pesticide residues and ginsenosides on reverse chromatography and hydrophilic chromatographic columns were evaluated by high performance liquid chromatography. The results proved that on the reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) stationary phase, in addition to the strong retentions of quintozene and pentachloroaniline, which could be clearly separated from the saponins, the retentions of the other five pesticide residues including carbendazim, azoxystrobin, procymidone, iprodione and propiconazole were similar to total ginsenosides. The seven ginsenosides showed strong retention due to the formation of hydrogen bonds between the hydroxyl groups on the sugar chain and the carboxyl groups on the HILIC stationary phase. However, the pesticide residues were not well retained because of their poor hydrophilicity and small molecular weights. For this reason, the pesticide residues and ginsenosides could be completely separated on the HILIC column. Thus, enrichment of the seven ginsenosides and removal of the 14 pesticide residues was realized in one step on the HILIC column. In addition, the effects of loading amount, loading volume, and washing volume on the removal of pesticide residues in ginsenosides were investigated using the Click XIon SPE column. Then, taking the ginsenoside recoveries and pesticide residue removal rates into account, we confirmed the following: the ratio of the maximum sample loading mass to the filler mass was 1∶10; the optimal elution volume was twice the column volume; and the optimal loading volume was twice the column volume. The ginseng extracts were solvated with a 95% ethanol solution and loaded onto an HILIC column. The sample was subjected to pesticide residue removal, and ginsenoside purification and enrichment under the optimum removal conditions. Gradient elution was carried out using ethanol and water as the mobile phases. The total ginsenoside content in the final extracts was increased to 69.61%. The recovery of the total ginsenosides was 94.4%. The pesticide residues in the samples were quantitatively detected by gas chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The 14 pesticide residues in the original ginsenoside extracts were effectively removed. The amounts of five residues were reduced to below 0.05 mg/kg, while the other nine residues were completely eliminated. This study demonstrates the application of HILIC to pesticide residue removal in traditional Chinese medicine extracts and reveals a new technique for the purification of natural products. The proposed method shows a high removal rate of pesticide residues and a high recovery of total ginsenosides. It is safe, efficient, and environment-friendly, and can aid the development of high-quality ginsenoside extracts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.