Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34227760›Full record

ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2021

[Simultaneous determination of 12 lipophilic shellfish toxins in plasma and urine by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].

Qiang Lin, Chao Yang, Meili Li, Jia Wang, Hanran Hou, Bing Shao, Yumin Niu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiang LinBeijing Yanqing District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102100, China.
Chao YangBeijing Yanqing District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102100, China.
Meili LiBeijing Yanqing District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102100, China.
Jia WangBeijing Yanqing District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102100, China.
Hanran HouBeijing Yanqing District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102100, China.
Bing ShaoBeijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100013, China.
Yumin NiuBeijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100013, China.
Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipophilic shellfish toxins pose significant threats to the health of seafood consumers and public health. The symptoms of these kinds of toxins include severe diarrhea, abdominal cramps, nausea and gastrointestinal disorders. These symptoms could be hardly distinguished with many other symptoms of food poisoning and diseases. Therefore, a fast and accurate determination method in human biological samples is urgently needed for the accurate judgement of food poisoning incident, which is important for the investigation of public health emergencies and clinical treatment of poisoned patients. However, there were several flaws of the previous studies reported on the analysis of lipophilic shellfish toxins: (1) limited target compounds were covered; (2) the pre-treatment process was complex; (3) the sensitivity of the compound was low. In this study, a simple extraction method coupled with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) was developed for the simultaneous determination of 12 lipophilic shellfish toxins, including azaspir acid 1 (AZA1), azaspir acid 2 (AZA2), azaspir acid 3 (AZA3), dinophysistoxin 1 (DTX1), dinophysistoxin 2 (DTX2), gymnodimine (GYM), hyessotoxin (HYTX), okadaic acid (OA), pinnatoxin (Pntx), pectenotoxins 2 (PTX2), spirolides 1 (SPX1), yessotoxin (YTX), in plasma and urine. Firstly, the instrument conditions were optimized. Different additions in mobile phase were compared and 0.05% (v/v) ammonia solution was selected since it can improve the peak shape of YTX and HYTX, and increase the respondence by four times. Secondly, the volume of acetonitrile (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 mL) use for the extraction of the target compounds in plasma was optimized. Satisfactory recoveries were obtained when 0.6 mL of acetonitrile was used. At the same time, satisfactory recoveries were obtained when 0.9 mL of acetonitrile was used in urine samples. Finally, under the optimized conditions, the 12 compounds in plasma and urine samples were ultrasonically extracted with acetonitrile. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Phenomenex Kinetex C18 column (50 mm×3 mm, 2.6 μm) with 90% (v/v) acetonitrile aqueous solution and water containing 0.05% (v/v) ammonia as mobile phases. Gradient elution with a flow rate of 0.40 mL/min was employed. The 12 compounds were monitored in the multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) mode with electrospray ionization (ESI) under both positive and negative conditions. The matrix effects of the 12 compounds ranged from 0.8 to 1.1. Therefore, external standard calibration curves were used for the quantification. The 12 shellfish toxins showed good linear relationship in the range of 0.03-36.25 μg/L with the correlation coefficients greater than 0.995. The limits of detection (LODs,

Indexed as

Marine ToxinsAnimalsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidHumansMiceShellfishTandem Mass SpectrometryMarine Toxinslipophilic shellfish toxinsplasmaultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS)urine

Identifiers

PMID34227760
PMCPMC9404129
OpenAlexW3177889453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.