Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34227718›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine journal2021

Utilisation of telehealth for outpatient diabetes management during COVID-19 pandemic: how did the patients fare?

Vincent W Wong, Alexandra Wang, Manimegalai Manoharan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincent W WongDiabetes and Endocrine Service, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7012-3511
Alexandra WangDiabetes and Endocrine Service, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Manimegalai ManoharanDiabetes and Endocrine Service, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Liverpool Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many outpatient services at public hospitals, including diabetes services, had adopted telehealth appointments for their clinic patients. There was concern that patients' glycaemic control may worsen during the pandemic.

aimTo assess glycaemic control of patients with diabetes attending telehealth consultations in 2020, compared to face-to-face reviews prior to pandemic.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of patients with diabetes managed by telehealth consultations over 5 months at two metropolitan hospitals in Sydney. Their attendance rate, glycaemic control and unplanned admissions to hospital were assessed, and these were compared with the same period 12 months prior when patients were reviewed via face-to-face appointments.

resultsBetween April and September 2020, the attendance rate for telehealth consultation at the diabetes services at the two hospitals was 88.9% (884 out of 994), which was higher than in 2019 (85.2%; 818 out of 959; P = 0.016) when patients attended via face-to-face appointments. Of the 629 patients reviewed via telehealth in 2020 and who had been with our service for over 12 months, glycaemic control was better in 2020 (HbA1c 7.8 ± 1.4% (62 ± 15 mmol/mol)) compared with 12 months earlier (8.2 ± 1.7% (66 ± 19 mmol/mol); P < 0.001). There was no difference in the number of unplanned admissions for this cohort in 2020 (n = 58; 9.2%) compared with 2019 (n = 75; 11.9%; P = 0.100).

conclusionsThe present study showed that for patients with diabetes who received care via telehealth consultations during the COVID-19 lockdown, their glycaemic control was slightly better, and unplanned admission rates were not higher compared with those in the pre-COVID-19 period. Telehealth consultation offers an important care delivery option in the management of patients with diabetes under these circumstances.

Indexed as

COVID-19Diabetes MellitusTelemedicineCommunicable Disease ControlHumansOutpatientsPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19diabetes mellitusglycaemic controloutpatient servicetelehealth

Identifiers

PMID34227718
PMCPMC8447012
OpenAlexW3178611989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.