Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34227707›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2022

New means, new measures: assessing prescription drug-seeking indicators over 10 years of the opioid epidemic.

Brea L Perry, Meltem Odabaş, Kai-Cheng Yang, Byungkyu Lee, Patrick Kaminski, Brian Aronson, Yong-Yeol Ahn, Carrie B Oser, Patricia R Freeman, Jeffrey C Talbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brea L PerryNetwork Science Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7869-7168
Meltem OdabaşDepartment of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6123-0676
Kai-Cheng YangSchool of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4627-9273
Byungkyu LeeDepartment of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Patrick KaminskiDepartment of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Brian AronsonDepartment of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Yong-Yeol AhnNetwork Science Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Carrie B OserDepartment of Sociology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Patricia R FreemanDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Jeffrey C TalbertDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

Doctor Shopping for Controlled Substances: Insights from Two-Mode Social Network AnalysisR01DA039928 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI PERRY, BREA LOUISE · 2016 to 2019
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPrescription drug-seeking (PDS) from multiple prescribers is a primary means of obtaining prescription opioids; however, PDS behavior has probably evolved in response to policy shifts, and there is little agreement about how to operationalize it. We systematically compared the performance of traditional and novel PDS indicators.

designLongitudinal study using a de-identified commercial claims database.

settingUnited States, 2009-18.

participantsA total of 318 million provider visits from 21.5 million opioid-prescribed patients. MEASUREMENTS: We applied binary classification and generalized linear models to compare predictive accuracy and average marginal effect size predicting future opioid use disorder (OUD), overdose and high morphine milligram equivalents (MME). We compared traditional indicators of PDS to a network centrality measure, PageRank, that reflects the prominence of patients in a co-prescribing network. Analyses used the same data and adjusted for patient demographics, region, SES, diagnoses and health services.

findingsThe predictive accuracy of a widely used traditional measure (N + unique doctors and N + unique pharmacies in 90 days) on OUD, overdose and MME decreased between 2009 and 2018, and performed no better than chance (50% accuracy) after 2015. Binarized PageRank measures however exhibited higher predictive accuracy than the traditional binary measures throughout 2009-2018. Continuous indicators of PDS performed better than binary thresholds, with days of Rx performing best overall with 77-93% predictive accuracy. For example, days of Rx had the highest average marginal effects on overdose and OUD: a 1 standard deviation increase in days of Rx was associated with a 6-8% [confidence intervals (CIs) = 0.058-0.061 and 0.078-0.082] increase in the probability of overdose and a 4-5% (CIs = 0.038-0.043 and 0.047-0.053) increase in the probability of OUD. PageRank performed nearly as well or better than traditional indicators of PDS, with predictive performance increasing after 2016.

conclusionsIn the United States, network-based measures appear to have increasing promise for identifying prescription opioid drug-seeking behavior, while indicators based on quantity of providers or pharmacies appear to have decreasing utility.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidPrescription DrugsDrug PrescriptionsDrug-Seeking BehaviorHumansLongitudinal StudiesOpioid EpidemicPractice Patterns, Physicians'United StatesAnalgesics, OpioidPrescription DrugsCo-prescription networksdrug dependenceopiatesopioid use disorderoverdoseprescription drug-seekingprescription opioids

Identifiers

PMID34227707
PMCPMC8664959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.