Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34227464›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Novel neuroanatomical integration and scaling define avian brain shape evolution and development.

Akinobu Watanabe, Amy M Balanoff, Paul M Gignac, M Eugenia L Gold, Mark A Norell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Akinobu WatanabeDepartment of Anatomy, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5057-4772
Amy M BalanoffDivision of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4030-3818
Paul M GignacDivision of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9181-3258
M Eugenia L GoldDivision of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4317-3625
Mark A NorellDivision of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, United States.
American Museum of Natural History · USNatural History Museum · GB

Funding

American Museum of Natural History Division of PaleontologyNational Science Foundation DEB-1311790National Science Foundation DEB-1406849National Science Foundation DEB-1457180National Science Foundation DEB-1754659National Science Foundation DEB-1801224National Science Foundation Graduate Research FellowshipSociety of Vertebrate Paleontology Mary R. Dawson Predoctoral Fellowship Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do large and unique brains evolve? Historically, comparative neuroanatomical studies have attributed the evolutionary genesis of highly encephalized brains to deviations along, as well as from, conserved scaling relationships among brain regions. However, the relative contributions of these concerted (integrated) and mosaic (modular) processes as drivers of brain evolution remain unclear, especially in non-mammalian groups. While proportional brain sizes have been the predominant metric used to characterize brain morphology to date, we perform a high-density geometric morphometric analysis on the encephalized brains of crown birds (Neornithes or Aves) compared to their stem taxa-the non-avialan coelurosaurian dinosaurs and

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAlligators and CrocodilesAnimalsBrainChickensMalealligatoravesbrain evolutionchickendinosauriaevolutionary biologygeometric morphometricsphenotypic integration

Identifiers

PMID34227464
PMCPMC8260227
OpenAlexW3181106936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.