Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34227460›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2021

Tingting Yan, Michael Lang, Teddy Kyomuhangi, Barbara Naggayi, Jerome Kabakyenga, Wasswa William, Scholastic Ashaba, Clementia Murembe Neema, Manasseh Tumuhimbise, Robens Mutatina and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Tingting YanDepartment of Paediatrics and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3615-8710
Michael LangFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5738-7280
Teddy KyomuhangiMaternal Newborn and Child Health Institute, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Barbara NaggayiFaculty of Interdisciplinary Studies, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Jerome KabakyengaMaternal Newborn and Child Health Institute, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-1912-1032
Wasswa WilliamDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Scholastic AshabaDepartment of Psychiatry, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Clementia Murembe NeemaDepartment of Human Development and Relational Sciences, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Manasseh TumuhimbiseFaculty of Business and Management Sciences, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Robens MutatinaMaternal Newborn and Child Health Institute, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Deborah NatumanyaDepartment of Computer Science, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Jennifer L BrennerDepartment of Paediatrics and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0146-052X
Mbarara University of Science and Technology · UGUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital storytelling (DST) is a participatory, arts-based methodology that facilitates the creation of short films called digital stories. Both the DST process and resulting digital stories can be used for education, research, advocacy, and therapeutic purposes in public health. DST is widely used in Europe and North America, and becoming increasingly common in Africa. In East Africa, there is currently limited in-country DST facilitation capacity, which restricts the scope of use. Through a Ugandan-Canadian partnership, six Ugandan faculty and staff from Mbarara University of Science and Technology participated in a pilot DST facilitation training workshop to enhance Ugandan DST capacity.

objectiveThis Participatory Action Research (PAR) study assessed the modification of DST methodology, and identified the future potential of DST in Uganda and other East African settings.

methodsIn the two-week DST Facilitator Training, trainees created their own stories, learned DST technique and theory, facilitated DST with community health workers, and led a community screening. All trainees were invited to contribute to this study. Data was collected through daily reflection and journaling which informed a final, post-workshop focus group where participants and researchers collaboratively analyzed observations and generated themes.

resultsIn total, twelve stories were created, six by trainees and six by community health workers. Three key themes emerged from PAR analysis: DST was a culturally appropriate way to modernize oral storytelling traditions and had potential for broad use in Uganda; DST could be modified to address ethical and logistical challenges of working with vulnerable groups in-country; training in-country facilitators was perceived as advantageous in addressing community priorities.

conclusionThis pilot study suggests DST is a promising methodology that can potentially be used for many purposes in an East African setting. Building in-country DST facilitation capacity will accelerate opportunities for addressing community health priorities through amplifying local voices.

Indexed as

CommunicationNarrationCanadaHumansPilot ProjectsUgandaDigital storytellingDSThealth communicationhealth promotionparticipatory action researchUganda

Identifiers

PMID34227460
PMCPMC8266251
OpenAlexW3177534404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.