ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning survival prediction in esophageal cancer using radiomics and body composition from pretreatment and follow-up T12-level computed tomography.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Imaging in Esophageal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2025Review
- Current and future on definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for inoperable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Opportunities and challenges in combining immunotherapy and radiotherapy in esophageal cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Prognostic Value of Sarcopenia and Metabolic Parameters ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical trials, efficacy and future directions.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Change in Density Not Size of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Is Associated with Improved Survival Outcomes.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022Article
- Article
- Tumor cell-derived exosomal lncRNA LOC441178 inhibits the tumorigenesis of esophageal carcinoma through suppressing macrophage M2 polarization.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2022Article
- Prognostic factors associated withBMC cancer · 2022Article
- CanCancers · 2022Article
- Prognostic value ofFrontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Article
- Prognostic Value ofMetabolites · 2021Article
- Real-World Outcomes of FLOT versus CROSS Regimens for Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancers.Gastrointestinal tumorsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThis study evaluated the prognostic value of
methodsWe analyzed the prognosis of 50 non-metastatic squamous cell esophageal cancer (T1-4N0-2) patients who underwent CCRT with curative intent at Inje University Busan Paik Hospital and Haeundae Paik Hospital from 2009 to 2019. Median total radiation dose was 54 Gy (range 34-66 Gy). Our aim was to investigate the relationship between PET/CT values and prognosis. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).
resultsThe median follow-up period was 9.9 months (range 1.7-85.7). Median baseline maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was 14.2 (range 3.2-27.7). After treatment, 29 patients (58%) showed disease progression. The 3-year PFS and overall survival (OS) were 24.2% and 54.5%, respectively. PFS was significantly lower (
conclusionMaximum SUV of PET/CT is useful in predicting prognosis of esophageal cancer patients treated with CCRT. Efforts to find more effective treatments for patients at high risk of progression are still warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.