Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34227179›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical nursing2022

COVID-19 vaccination intention in the first year of the pandemic: A systematic review.

Rasmieh Al-Amer, Della Maneze, Bronwyn Everett, Jed Montayre, Amy R Villarosa, Entisar Dwekat, Yenna Salamonson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 155 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
33.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 294 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Implications for COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A systematic review.Journal of infection and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rasmieh Al-AmerNursing School, Isra University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Della ManezeWestern Sydney University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Penrith, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6475-8804
Bronwyn EverettWestern Sydney University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Penrith, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1733-7462
Jed MontayreWestern Sydney University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Penrith, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2435-8061
Amy R VillarosaWestern Sydney University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Penrith, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3198-472X
Entisar DwekatNursing School, Isra University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Yenna SalamonsonWestern Sydney University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Penrith, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7429-4086
Ingham Institute · AUUniversity of Jordan · JOCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesTo synthesise evidence regarding vaccination intention, identify factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals and the general populations globally.

backgroundAs COVID-19 vaccine becomes available worldwide, attention is being directed to community vaccine uptake, to achieve population-wide immunity. A number of factors have been reported to influence vaccine intention.

methodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search of COVID-19 vaccination intention related literature published on or before 31 December 2020 from seven databases was undertaken.

resultsThirty articles were included in this systematic review. Overall COVID-19 vaccination intention during the first year of the pandemic ranged from 27.7% to 93.3%. Findings highlighted that socio-demographic differences, perceptions of risk and susceptibility to COVID-19 and vaccine attributes influenced vaccination intention. Healthcare professionals particularly, nurses have higher vaccine hesitancy reportedly due to concerns regarding vaccine safety and efficacy and mistrust of health authorities. Negative information about COVID-19 vaccines in the social media and low confidence in the health system were associated with lower acceptability among the community. Interestingly, cumulative increase in COVID-19 caseloads of countries over time was not associated with vaccination intention.

conclusionsThe significant variability in vaccine intention rates worldwide would hamper efforts to achieve immunity against COVID-19. Nurses' concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy need to be addressed to increase vaccine acceptance and maximise their influence on vaccination decision in the community. As misinformation through social media negatively impacts vaccination uptake, authoritative and reliable information on vaccine attributes, disease risks and vaccination benefits are needed. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy including misinformation are important contributors to vaccine hesitancy. Addressing these factors, particularly among nurses who are considered trusted influencers of vaccination decisions in the community is an important strategy for pandemic preparedness.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansIntentionPandemicsSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinescoronavirusCOVID-19vaccinationvaccine acceptancevaccine hesitancyvaccine uptake

Identifiers

PMID34227179
PMCPMC8447353
OpenAlexW3178643276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.