Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34226922›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2021

To bend without breaking: a qualitative study on leadership by doctors in Sierra Leone.

Oliver Johnson, Foday Sahr, Kerrin Begg, Nick Sevdalis, Ann H Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oliver JohnsonCentre for Implementation Science, Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, David Goldberg Centre, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8698-0553
Foday SahrDepartment of Microbiology, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, 12 Victoria Street, Kossoh Town, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Kerrin BeggSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Falmouth Building, Anzio Road, Cape Town 7925, South Africa.
Nick SevdalisCentre for Implementation Science, Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, David Goldberg Centre, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Ann H KellyDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, School of Global Affairs, Faculty of Social Science & Public Policy, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.

Funding

European Research Council 715450MRC-AHRC MC_PC_MR/R024510/1National Institute for Health Research GHRU 16/136/54
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strong leadership capabilities are essential for effective health services, yet definitions of leadership remain contested. Despite the acknowledged contextual specificity of leadership styles, most leadership theories draw heavily from Western conceptualizations. This cultural bias may attenuate the effectiveness of programmes intended to transform healthcare practice in Sub-Saharan Africa, where few empirical studies on health leadership have been conducted. This paper examines how effective leadership by doctors was perceived by stakeholders in one particular context, Sierra Leone. Drawing together extensive experience of in-country healthcare provision with a series of in-depth interviews with 27 Sierra Leonean doctors, we extended a grounded-theory approach to come to grips with the reach and relevance of contemporary leadership models in capturing the local experiences and relevance of leadership. We found that participants conceptualized leadership according to established leadership models, such as transformational and relational theories. However, participants also pointed to distinctive challenges attendant to healthcare provision in Sierra Leone that required specific leadership capabilities. Context-specific factors included health system breakdown, politicization in the health sector and lack of accountability, placing importance on skills such as persistence, role modelling and taking initiative. Participants also described pressure to behave in ways they deemed antithetical to their personal and professional values and also necessary in order to continue a career in the public sector. The challenge of navigating such ethical dilemmas was a defining feature of leadership in Sierra Leone. Our research demonstrates that while international leadership models were relevant in this context, there is strong emphasis on contingent or situational leadership theories. We further contribute to policy and practice by informing design of leadership development programmes and the establishment of a more enabling environment for medical leadership by governments and international donors.

Indexed as

LeadershipPhysiciansGrounded TheoryHumansQualitative ResearchSierra Leoneclinical leadershiphealth system contextLeadershipleadership capabilityleadership developmentSierra LeoneSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID34226922
PMCPMC8597969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.