Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34226886›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP2021

Changes to summative skills-based assessments within the Big Ten Academic Alliance Performance-Based Assessment Collaborative (BTAA-PBAC) due to COVID-19.

Mary Nolan, Marina Maes, Deanna Tran, Tara Driscoll, Laura Knockel, Jared Van Hooser, Colleen Dula, Kristen Cook, Morgan Stoa, Amy Ives and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mary NolanPurdue University College of Pharmacy West Lafayette Indiana USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8430-5375
Marina MaesUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy Madison Wisconsin USA.
Deanna TranUniversity of Maryland School of Pharmacy Baltimore Maryland USA.
Tara DriscollUniversity of Illinois Chicago College of Pharmacy Chicago Illinois USA.
Laura KnockelThe University of Iowa College of Pharmacy Iowa City Iowa USA.
Jared Van HooserUniversity of Minnesota College of Pharmacy Duluth Minnesota USA.
Colleen DulaThe Ohio State University College of Pharmacy Columbus Ohio USA.
Kristen CookUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy Omaha Nebraska USA.
Morgan StoaUniversity of Minnesota College of Pharmacy Duluth Minnesota USA.
Amy IvesUniversity of Maryland School of Pharmacy Baltimore Maryland USA.
Lucio VolinoRutgers University Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy Piscataway New Jersey USA.
Nichole RupnowUniversity of Minnesota College of Pharmacy Duluth Minnesota USA.
Kristine ParbuoniUniversity of Maryland School of Pharmacy Baltimore Maryland USA.
Jamie L WoodyardPurdue University College of Pharmacy West Lafayette Indiana USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In Spring 2020 many academic institutions transitioned to remote learning in response to the developing COVID-19 pandemic. These changes affected skills-based training, as schools of pharmacy were forced to transition traditionally in-person assessments to a remote setting. The purpose of this article is to describe the experience of pharmacy skills lab coordinators when transitioning summative skills-based assessments (SSBA). Methods: A web-based survey instrument administered through Qualtrics Results: Nine of ten invited institutions responded to the survey. Of the nine respondents, three participated in the post-survey interview. Overall, 79.5% (93/117) of skills planned to be assessed were assessed with or without modification, with 8.5% (10/117) of skills canceled and 10.3% (12/117) of skills assessments postponed. The most common challenges mentioned were the lack of preparation time, inability to assess certain skills virtually, and student barriers. The most common recommendations made were to prioritize lab components and incorporate flexibility in planning and scheduling. Discussion: The results indicate that most skills were still assessed during the Spring 2020 semester. Though the transition to remote learning was challenging and unique for each institution, common strategies and recommendations identified here provide opportunities for academics to analyze and prioritize learning objectives and to rethink how to develop and deliver SSBAs as remote assessments.

Indexed as

clinicalcompetenceCOVID‐19pharmacyschoolsstudentsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34226886
PMCPMC8242699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.