Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34226789›Full record

ArticleEnergy (Oxford, England)2021

Energy, environmental, economic and social equity (4E) pressures of COVID-19 vaccination mismanagement: A global perspective.

Peng Jiang, Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, Yee Van Fan, Xiuju Fu, Raymond R Tan, Siming You, Aoife M Foley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Energy (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Engineering poly- and micelleplexes for nucleic acid delivery - A reflection on their endosomal escape.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Sustainable development in period of COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of cleaner production · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peng JiangDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China.
Jiří Jaromír KlemešSustainable Process Integration Laboratory - SPIL, NETME Centre, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology- VUT Brno, Technická 2896/2, 616 69, Brno, Czech Republic.
Yee Van FanSustainable Process Integration Laboratory - SPIL, NETME Centre, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology- VUT Brno, Technická 2896/2, 616 69, Brno, Czech Republic.
Xiuju FuDepartment of Systems Science, Institute of High Performance Computing (IHPC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore, 138632, Singapore.
Raymond R TanChemical Engineering Department, De La Salle University, 2401 Taft Avenue, 0922, Manila, Philippines.
Siming YouJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom.
Aoife M FoleyCivil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination now offers a way to resolve the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it is critical to recognise the full energy, environmental, economic and social equity (4E) impacts of the vaccination life cycle. The full 4E impacts include the design and trials, order management, material preparation, manufacturing, cold chain logistics, low-temperature storage, crowd management and end-of-life waste management. A life cycle perspective is necessary for sustainable vaccination management because a prolonged immunisation campaign for COVID-19 is likely. The impacts are geographically dispersed across sectors and regions, creating real and virtual 4E footprints that occur at different timescales. Decision-makers in industry and governments have to act, unify, resolve, and work together to implement more sustainable COVID-19 vaccination management globally and locally to minimise the 4E footprints. Potential practices include using renewable energy in production, storage, transportation and waste treatment, using better product design for packaging, using the Internet of Things (IoT) and big data analytics for better logistics, using real-time database management for better tracking of deliveries and public vaccination programmes, and using coordination platforms for more equitable vaccine access. These practices raise global challenges but suggest solutions with a 4E perspective, which could mitigate the impacts of global vaccination campaigns and prepare sustainably for future pandemics and global warming.

Indexed as

Cold chain logisticsCOVID-19Energy-environment-economy-equitySustainable managementVaccinationVaccines

Identifiers

PMID34226789
PMCPMC8245053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.